Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;26(10):1700-1713.
doi: 10.1111/ele.14284. Epub 2023 Jul 17.

Quality matters: Stoichiometry of resources modulates spatial feedbacks in aquatic-terrestrial meta-ecosystems

Benoît Pichon  1   2 , Elisa Thébault  1 , Gérard Lacroix  1   3 , Isabelle Gounand  1
Affiliations

Quality matters: Stoichiometry of resources modulates spatial feedbacks in aquatic-terrestrial meta-ecosystems

Benoît Pichon et al. Ecol Lett. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Species dispersal and resource spatial flows greatly affect the dynamics of connected ecosystems. So far, research on meta-ecosystems has mainly focused on the quantitative effect of subsidy flows. Yet, resource exchanges at heterotrophic-autotrophic (e.g. aquatic-terrestrial) ecotones display a stoichiometric asymmetry that likely matters for functioning. Here, we joined ecological stoichiometry and the meta-ecosystem framework to understand how subsidy stoichiometry mediates the response of the meta-ecosystem to subsidy flows. Our model results demonstrate that resource flows between ecosystems can induce a positive spatial feedback loop, leading to higher production at the meta-ecosystem scale by relaxing local ecosystem limitations ('spatial complementarity'). Furthermore, we show that spatial flows can also have an unexpected negative impact on production when accentuating the stoichiometric mismatch between local resources and basal species needs. This study paves the way for studies on the interdependency of ecosystems at the landscape extent.

Keywords: cross-ecosystem subsidy; landscape scale; meta-ecosystem; spatial feedbacks; stoichiometry; terrestrial-aquatic ecotone.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Allen, D.C. & Wesner, J.S. (2016) Synthesis: comparing effects of resource and consumer fluxes into recipient food webs using meta-analysis. Ecology, 97, 594-604.
    1. Anderson, T., Hessen, D., Elser, J. & Urabe, J. (2005) Metabolic stoichiometry and the fate of excess carbon and nutrients in consumers. The American Naturalist, 165, 1-15.
    1. Anderson, T.M., Hopcraft, J.G.C., Eby, S., Ritchie, M., Grace, J.B. & Olff, H. (2010) Landscape-scale analyses suggest both nutrient and antipredator advantages to Serengeti herbivore hotspots. Ecology, 91, 1519-1529.
    1. Bartels, P., Cucherousset, J., Steger, K., Eklöv, P., Tranvik, L.J. & Hillebrand, H. (2012) Reciprocal subsidies between freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems structure consumer resource dynamics. Ecology, 93, 1173-1182.
    1. Baxter, C.V., Fausch, K.D. & Carl Saunders, W. (2005) Tangled webs: reciprocal flows of invertebrate prey link streams and riparian zones: prey subsidies link stream and riparian food webs. Freshwater Biology, 50, 201-220.

LinkOut - more resources