Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Aug 1;237(2):309-317.
doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000705. Epub 2023 Apr 11.

Hernia Prevention Using Biologic Mesh and/or Small Bites: A Multispecialty 2 × 2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial

Rainna Coelho  1 , Naila H Dhanani  2 , Nicole B Lyons  3 , Karla Bernardi  2 , Erik P Askenasy  2 , Stefanos Millas  2 , Julie L Holihan  2 , Zuhair Ali  1 , Mike K Liang  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Hernia Prevention Using Biologic Mesh and/or Small Bites: A Multispecialty 2 × 2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial

Rainna Coelho et al. J Am Coll Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Ventral incisional hernias are the most common complication after abdominal operation. Randomized trials have shown efficacy of prophylactic synthetic mesh and small bites. Adoption of these practices has been limited due to concerns with placement of synthetic mesh in contaminated cases and small bites in an overweight population. We sought to assess the efficacy of prophylactic biologic mesh and small bites to prevent postoperative major complications: ventral incisional hernias, surgical site infection, reoperation, and death.

Study design: High-risk patients (overweight/obese, current smoker) undergoing abdominal operation with a midline incision (5 cm or greater) were randomized (2 × 2 factorial trial) to receive either sublay biologic mesh or no mesh and either small bites (0.5 × 0. 5cm) or large bites (1 × 1 cm) fascial closure. The primary outcome measure was major complications at 1 year postoperative. CONSORT guidelines were followed, and this study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03148496). Assuming α = 0.05, β = 0.20, and Δ = 20%, it was estimated that 105 patients were needed. Primary outcome was assessed using Fisher's exact test.

Results: A total of 107 patients were randomized: 52 (49%) to mesh, 55 (51%) to no mesh, 55 (51%) to small bites, and 52 (49%) to large bites. Of the patients, 16% were smokers, 31% were overweight, and 55% were obese. At 1 year postoperative, there were no differences in major complications between groups (mesh vs no mesh 21% vs 16%, p = 0.62; small vs large bites 18% vs 19%, p = 1.00).

Conclusions: In this trial, biologic mesh and small bites appear to have no benefit. Further randomized trials are needed among high-risk patients before widespread adoption of prophylactic biologic mesh or small bites.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CONSORT flow diagram.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Interaction between 2 randomization variables (mesh vs no mesh and small bites vs large bites).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Olavarria OA, Dhanani NH, Bernardi K, et al. Prophylactic mesh reinforcement for prevention of midline incisional hernias: a publication bias adjusted meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2023;277:e162–e169. - PubMed
    1. Jairam AP, Timmermans L, Eker HH, et al.; PRIMA Trialist Group. Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2017;390:567–576. - PubMed
    1. Glauser PM, Brosi P, Speich B, et al. Prophylactic intraperitoneal onlay mesh following midline laparotomy-long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 2019;43:1669–1675. - PubMed
    1. Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 2009;144:1056–1059. - PubMed
    1. Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW, et al. Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015;386:1254–1260. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data