Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Aug 1;211(3):325-332.
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2300121.

The Energetic Landscape of Catch Bonds in TCR Interfaces

Affiliations
Review

The Energetic Landscape of Catch Bonds in TCR Interfaces

Cory M Ayres et al. J Immunol. .

Abstract

Recognition of peptide/MHC complexes by αβ TCRs has traditionally been viewed through the lens of conventional receptor-ligand theory. Recent work, however, has shown that TCR recognition and T cell signaling can be profoundly influenced and tuned by mechanical forces. One outcome of applied force is the catch bond, where TCR dissociation rates decrease (half-lives increase) when limited force is applied. Although catch bond behavior is believed to be widespread in biology, its counterintuitive nature coupled with the difficulties of describing mechanisms at the structural level have resulted in considerable mystique. In this review, we demonstrate that viewing catch bonds through the lens of energy landscapes, barriers, and the ensuing reaction rates can help demystify catch bonding and provide a foundation on which atomic-level TCR catch bond mechanisms can be built.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematics of force induced changes to the TCR binding energy landscape. A) Simplified energy diagram showing how a slower rate of dissociation can emerge through force-induced alteration of the height of the energy barrier for dissociation. Free energy is on the y-axis, dimensionless reaction coordinate is on the x-axis. The blue line represents the traditional, force-free binding reaction, showing a single binding transition state as the unbound TCR and pMHC associate to form the lower energy TCR-pMHC complex. The solid green line illustrates force-induced stabilization of the complex, resulting in a slower dissociation rate due to the higher barrier. Although the solid green line emphasizes stabilization of the bound state, force-induced impacts to the entire trajectory are possible as illustrated by the broader, semi-transparent green shading around the line beginning just before the transition state. Potential new states introduced with applied force are not shown. B) Energy landscape figure that more comprehensively illustrates force-induced stabilization of the TCR-pMHC complex. In the absence of force, TCR binds pMHC forming the force-free TCR-pMHC complex as illustrated by the blue path. With the application of weak force, the TCR-pMHC complex can transition to an altered conformation, referred to as TCR-pMHC*, illustrated by the red path. Compared to the force-free complex, this force-stabilized conformation has a higher barrier for dissociation and thus does so with a slower rate, as shown by the green line (mimicking the green line in panel A; note that dissociation by first returning to the force-free complex is also possible but will be even slower, as there two barriers to cross). As described in the text, the figure is still simplified, showing a substantially stabilized complex for effect and leaving out possible microstates or intermediates and other consequences such as force-induced alterations of barrier heights as shown in panel A. C) In the absence of applied force, the TCR-pMHC* complex in panel B cannot form to any appreciable extent as its energy is high. The energy surface in this panel can also describe a force-induced slip bond, in which applied force pulls the complex into a destabilized state from which dissociation is rapid.

References

    1. Holler PD, and Kranz DM. 2003. Quantitative Analysis of the Contribution of TCR/pepMHC Affinity and CD8 to T Cell Activation. Immunity 18: 255–264. - PubMed
    1. Spear TT, Wang Y, Foley KC, Murray DC, Scurti GM, Simms PE, Garrett-Mayer E, Hellman LM, Baker BM, and Nishimura MI. 2017. Critical biological parameters modulate affinity as a determinant of function in T-cell receptor gene-modified T-cells. Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy 66: 1411–1424. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kalergis AM, Boucheron N, Doucey MA, Palmieri E, Goyarts EC, Vegh Z, Luescher IF, and Nathenson SG. 2001. Efficient T cell activation requires an optimal dwell-time of interaction between the TCR and the pMHC complex. Nat Immunol 2: 229–234. - PubMed
    1. McKeithan TW 1995. Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92: 5042–5046. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker BM, Gagnon SJ, Biddison WE, and Wiley DC. 2000. Conversion of a T Cell Antagonist into an Agonist by Repairing a Defect in the TCR/Peptide/MHC Interface. Implications for TCR Signaling. Immunity 13: 475–484. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances