Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 17;2(7):e0000277.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000277. eCollection 2023 Jul.

There's an App for it: A systematic review of mobile apps providing information about abortion using a revised MARS scale

Affiliations

There's an App for it: A systematic review of mobile apps providing information about abortion using a revised MARS scale

Bianca M Stifani et al. PLOS Digit Health. .

Abstract

Mobile applications (apps) are increasingly being used to access health-related information, but it may be challenging for consumers to identify accurate and reliable platforms. We conducted a systematic review of applications that provide information about abortion. We searched the iTunes and Google Play stores and queried professional networks to identify relevant apps. To evaluate the apps, we used the validated Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) and added relevant abortion-specific elements. Two reviewers independently rated each app, and we report mean scores on a 5-point scale across the domains of engagement, functionality, esthetics, and information. We also rated app characteristics (including target population and reach), and number of desirable abortion-specific features. We defined recommended apps as those that achieved a score of 4.0 or above for the question: "would you recommend this app to people who may benefit from it?" Our search initially yielded 282 apps and we identified two additional apps through professional mailing lists. Most were irrelevant or not abortion-specific. We excluded 37 apps that sought to discourage users from seeking abortion. Only 10 apps met inclusion criteria for this review. The Euki app had the highest overall score (4.0). Half of the apps achieved a score of 3.0 or greater. Most of the apps had few desirable design features. Some apps provided significant information but had poor functionality. Only four apps met criteria for being recommended: Euki, Safe Abortion by Hesperian, Ipas Mexico, and Marie Stopes Mexico. In conclusion, we found few apps that provide unbiased information about abortion, and their quality varied greatly. App developers and abortion experts should consider designing additional apps that are clinically accurate, unbiased and well-functioning. We registered this review in the PROSPERO database (Registration # CRD42020195802).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA Flowchart.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Flowchart of Abortion App Search.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Perez S. How the mobile app ecosystem adapted to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. The Crunch 2022. https://techcrunch.com/2022/01/10/how-the-mobile-app-ecosystem-adapted-t... [accessed May 12, 2022].
    1. Martin K, Kurowski D, Given P, Kennedy K, Clayton E. The impact of COVID-19 on the use of preventative health care. Health Care Cost Institute 2021. April 16. https://healthcostinstitute.org/hcci-research/the-impact-of-covid-19-on-... [accessed April 1, 2022].
    1. Rivera J, McPherson A, Hamilton J, Birken C, Coons M, Iyer S, et al. Mobile Apps for Weight Management: A Scoping Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016. Jul 26;4[3]:e87. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5115 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brzan PP, Rotman E, Pajnkihar M, Klanjsek P. Mobile Applications for Control and Self Management of Diabetes: A Systematic Review. J Med Syst. 2016. Sep;40[9]:210. doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0564-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Radovic A, Vona PL, Santostefano AM, Ciaravino S, Miller E, Stein BD. Smartphone Applications for Mental Health. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016. Jul;19[7]:465–70. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0619 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources