TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY AND RELIABLE CHANGE INDEX OF MOBILE APPLICATION NEUROCOGNITIVE TEST AMONG MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETES
- PMID: 37459377
- PMCID: PMC10895400
- DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-0018.23
TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY AND RELIABLE CHANGE INDEX OF MOBILE APPLICATION NEUROCOGNITIVE TEST AMONG MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETES
Abstract
Context: A mobile application neurocognitive assessment has been used in place of equipment intensive computerized neurocognitive assessment protocol. A previous study reported high to very high test-retest reliability of neurocognitive assessment using the mobile application in healthy adults, but no studies have examined test-retest reliability, reliable change indices (RCIs), and sex effect in middle school and high school populations when conducted 1 year apart.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the test-retest reliability and RCIs of baseline data collected at 2-time points approximately 1 year apart using a mobile application neurocognitive rest in middle school and high school athletes. The secondary purpose of the study was to investigate the sex difference in neurocognitive measures.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: Institutional.
Patients or other participants: 172 middle school and high school healthy student-athletes (mean age=13.78±1.59 years old).
Main outcome measure(s): Mobile application neurocognitive rest scores (reaction time, impulse control, inspection, and memory).
Results: The result from the study demonstrated that neurocognitive measures had low test-retest reliability across a 1-year time period in middle and high school settings. Upon retesting, reaction time and inspection time improved significantly in both middle and high school athletes, and impulse control showed significant improvement in middle school athletes. More athletes in middle school showed more RCI improvements compared to high school athletes. While both males and females demonstrated improvements in neurocognitive measures throughout adolescence, males outperformed females on reaction time and impulse control.
Conclusions: Findings from the study indicate unacceptably low test-retest reliability of a mobile application neurocognitive test most likely due to cognitive development occurring throughout adolescence. Additionally, significant RCIs were noted. These naturally occurring improvements due to cognitive development could mask the post-concussion deficits. The findings warrant consideration of age and sex on the neurocognitive performance of middle and high school athletes.
Keywords: Concussion assessment; Neurocognitive test; Reliable Change Index; Sex difference; Test-retest reliability.
Similar articles
-
Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test in Baseline Concussion Testing of High School Athletes.Clin J Sport Med. 2015 Jul;25(4):367-72. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000139. Clin J Sport Med. 2015. PMID: 25061807
-
Examination of the Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test Battery.Am J Sports Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):2000-5. doi: 10.1177/0363546514535901. Epub 2014 Jun 6. Am J Sports Med. 2014. PMID: 24907286
-
Short-term test-retest reliability of the ImPACT in healthy young athletes.Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2018 Jul-Sep;7(3):208-216. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2017.1290529. Epub 2017 Feb 22. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2018. PMID: 28631965
-
The influence of validity criteria on Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) test-retest reliability among high school athletes.J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017 Apr;39(3):286-295. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1224322. Epub 2016 Sep 2. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017. PMID: 27585635
-
American Medical Society for Sports Medicine position statement: concussion in sport.Br J Sports Med. 2013 Jan;47(1):15-26. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091941. Br J Sports Med. 2013. PMID: 23243113 Review.
References
-
- Lovell MR, Collins MW, Fu FM, Burke CJ, Maroon JC, Podell K. Neuropsychological testing in sports: past, present and future Brit J Sports Med 2001. 35 (5) 373.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical