US LI-RADS in surveillance for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after curative treatment
- PMID: 37460801
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09903-7
US LI-RADS in surveillance for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after curative treatment
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the performance of US LI-RADS in surveillance for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) after curative treatment.
Materials and methods: This study enrolled 644 patients between January 2018 and August 2018 as a derivation cohort, and 397 patients from September 2018 to December 2018 as a validation cohort. The US surveillance after HCC curative treatment was performed. The US LI-RADS observation categories and visualization scores were analyzed. Four criteria using US LI-RADS or Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) as the surveillance algorithm were evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.
Results: A total of 212 (32.9%) patients in derivation cohort and 158 (39.8%) patients in validation cohort were detected to have RHCCs. The criterion of US-2/3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L had higher sensitivity (derivation, 96.7% vs 92.9% vs 81.1% vs 90.6%; validation, 96.2% vs 90.5% vs 80.4% vs 89.9%) and NPV (derivation, 95.7% vs 93.3% vs 88.0% vs 91.8%; validation, 94.6% vs 89.4% vs 83.6% vs 89.0%), but lower specificity (derivation, 35.9% vs 48.2% vs 67.6% vs 51.9%; validation, 43.5% vs 52.7% vs 66.1% vs 54.0%) than criterion of US-2/3, US-3, and US-3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L. Analysis of the visualization score subgroups confirmed that the sensitivity (89.2-97.6% vs 81.0-83.3%) and NPV(88.4-98.0% vs 80.0-83.3%) of score A and score B groups were higher than score C group in criterion of US-2/3 in both two cohorts.
Conclusions: In the surveillance for RHCC, US LI-RADS with AFP had a high sensitivity and NPV when US-2/3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L was considered a criterion.
Clinical relevance statement: The criterion of US-2/3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L improves sensitivity and NPV for RHCC surveillance, which provides a valuable reference for patients in RHCC surveillance after curative treatment.
Key points: • US LI-RADS with AFP had high sensitivity and NPV in surveillance for RHCC when considering US-2/3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L as a criterion. • After US with AFP surveillance, patients with US-2/3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L should perform enhanced imaging for confirmative diagnosis. Patients with US-1 or AFP < 20 µg/L continue to repeat US with AFP surveillance. • Patients with risk factors for poor visualization scores limited the sensitivity of US surveillance in RHCC.
Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Recurrence; Surveillance; Ultrasound.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
Similar articles
-
LI-RADS Ultrasound Surveillance Version 2024: Comparison With Version 2017 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection and Risk Factors for Visualization Score C.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2025 Apr;224(4):e2432433. doi: 10.2214/AJR.24.32433. Epub 2025 Jan 22. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2025. PMID: 39840963
-
The Value of CEUS LI-RADS combined with AFP in early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in low- and high-risk patients.J Cancer Res Ther. 2024 Aug 1;20(4):1274-1283. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_125_24. Epub 2024 Aug 29. J Cancer Res Ther. 2024. PMID: 38958652
-
Diagnostic algorithm for subcentimeter hepatocellular carcinoma using alpha-fetoprotein and imaging features on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.Eur Radiol. 2024 Apr;34(4):2271-2282. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10214-0. Epub 2023 Oct 4. Eur Radiol. 2024. PMID: 37792079
-
US LI-RADS: ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system for screening and surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Jan;43(1):41-55. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1317-y. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018. PMID: 28936543 Review.
-
Role of US LI-RADS in the LI-RADS Algorithm.Radiographics. 2019 May-Jun;39(3):690-708. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019180158. Radiographics. 2019. PMID: 31059393 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- 81971630/National Natural Science Foundation of China
- 82171960/National Natural Science Foundation of China
- 2021B1515020054/Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
- 2022A1515011148/Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
- 2021B1515120030/Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical