Surgical treatment trends and outcomes for anal fistula: fistulotomy is still accurate and safe. Results from a nationwide observational study
- PMID: 37460829
- DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02842-x
Surgical treatment trends and outcomes for anal fistula: fistulotomy is still accurate and safe. Results from a nationwide observational study
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to analyse current surgical treatment preferences for anal fistula (AF) and its subtypes and nationwide results in terms of success and complications.
Methods: A retrospective multicentre observational cohort study was conducted. The study period was 1 year (2019), with a follow-up period of at least 1 year. A descriptive analysis of patient characteristics and trends regarding technical options was performed. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to analyse factors associated with healing and faecal incontinence (FI).
Results: Fifty-one hospitals were involved, providing data on 1628 patients with AF. At a median follow-up of 18.3 (9.9-28.3) months, 1231 (75.9%) patients achieved healing, while 390 (24.1%) did not; failure was catalogued as persistence in 279 (17.2.0%) patients and as recurrence in 111 (6.8%). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with healing were fistulotomy (OR 5.5; 95% CI 3.8-7.9; p < 0.001), simple fistula (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.5-2.8; p < 0.001), single tract (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.3-2.8; p < 0.001) and number of preparatory surgeries (none vs. 3; HR 1.8; 95% CI 1.2-2.8; p = 0.006). Regarding de novo FI, in the multivariate analysis previous anal surgery (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.4, p = 0.037), age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04, p = 0.002) and being female (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.5, p = 0.008) were statistically related.
Conclusions: Anal fistulotomy is the most used procedure for AF, especially for simple AF, with a favourable overall balance between healing and continence impairment. Sphincter-sparing or minimally invasive sphincter-sparing techniques resulted in lower rates of healing. In spite of their intended sphincter-sparing design, a certain degree of FI was observed for several of these techniques.
Keywords: Anal canal; Anal fistula; Faecal incontinence; Follow-up studies; Organ sparing treatments.
© 2023. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Similar articles
-
External sphincter-sparing anal fistulotomy (ESSAF): a simplified technique for the treatment of fistula-in-ano.Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Dec;25(12):1311-1318. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02525-5. Epub 2021 Oct 1. Tech Coloproctol. 2021. PMID: 34599414
-
Long-term Evaluation of Fistulotomy and Immediate Sphincteroplasty as a Treatment for Complex Anal Fistula.Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Nov 1;64(11):1374-1384. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001800. Dis Colon Rectum. 2021. PMID: 34623349
-
Drainage Seton Versus External Anal Sphincter-Sparing Seton After Rerouting of the Fistula Tract in the Treatment of Complex Anal Fistula: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Aug;62(8):980-987. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001416. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019. PMID: 31162376 Clinical Trial.
-
One stage fistulectomy for high anal fistula with reconstruction of anal sphincter without fecal diversion.Asian J Surg. 2019 Aug;42(8):792-796. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.12.005. Epub 2019 Feb 6. Asian J Surg. 2019. PMID: 30738718 Review.
-
Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract: what is the evidence in a review?World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct 28;19(40):6805-13. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i40.6805. World J Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 24187455 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy of injection of autologous adipose tissue in the treatment of patients with complex and recurrent fistula-in-ano of cryptoglandular origin.Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Jul 9;28(1):81. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02963-x. Tech Coloproctol. 2024. PMID: 38980511 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- CerdanSantacruz C, Santos Rancano R, Vigara Garcia M, Fernandez Perez C, Ortega Lopez M, Cerdan MJ (2017) Prevalence of anal incontinence in a working population within a healthcare environment. Scand J Gastroenterol 52(12):1340–1347 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources