Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;38(13):2888-2897.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08294-1. Epub 2023 Jul 17.

Ideas from the Frontline: Improvement Opportunities in Federally Qualified Health Centers

Olivia S Jung  1   2   3 , Fahima Begum  4 , Andrea Dorbu  5 , Sara J Singer  6 , Patricia Satterstrom  7
Affiliations

Ideas from the Frontline: Improvement Opportunities in Federally Qualified Health Centers

Olivia S Jung et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Engaging frontline clinicians and staff in quality improvement is a promising bottom-up approach to transforming primary care practices. This may be especially true in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and similar safety-net settings where large-scale, top-down transformation efforts are often associated with declining worker morale and increasing burnout. Innovation contests, which decentralize problem-solving, can be used to involve frontline workers in idea generation and selection.

Objective: We aimed to describe the ideas that frontline clinicians and staff suggested via organizational innovation contests in a national sample of 54 FQHCs.

Interventions: Innovation contests solicited ideas for improving care from all frontline workers-regardless of professional expertise, job title, and organizational tenure and excluding those in senior management-and offered opportunities to vote on ideas.

Participants: A total of 1,417 frontline workers across all participating FQHCs generated 2,271 improvement opportunities.

Approaches: We performed a content analysis and organized the ideas into codes (e.g., standardization, workplace perks, new service, staff relationships, community development) and categories (e.g., operations, employees, patients).

Key results: Ideas from frontline workers in participating FQHCs called attention to standardization (n = 386, 17%), staffing (n = 244, 11%), patient experience (n = 223, 10%), staff training (n = 145, 6%), workplace perks (n = 142, 6%), compensation (n = 101, 5%), new service (n = 92, 4%), management-staff relationships (n = 82, 4%), and others. Voting results suggested that staffing resources, standardization, and patient communication were key issues among workers.

Conclusions: Innovation contests generated numerous ideas for improvement from the frontline. It is likely that the issues described in this study have become even more salient today, as the COVID-19 pandemic has had devastating impacts on work environments and health/social needs of patients living in low-resourced communities. Continued work is needed to promote learning and information exchange about opportunities to improve and transform practices between policymakers, managers, and providers and staff at the frontlines.

Keywords: employees; federally qualified health centers; frontline workers; ideas; innovation; innovation contests; primary care; quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of ideas in categories and codes.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jung OS, Jackson J, Majmudar M, McCree P, Isselbacher EM. Engaging frontline employees using innovation contests: Lessons from Massachusetts General Hospital. Healthcare. 2022;10(2):100615. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2022.100615. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jung OS, Aiken LH, Sloane DM, et al. Nurse Work Environment and Hospital-Onset Clostridioides difficile Infection. Med Care. 2023;61(6):360–365. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001854. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tucker AL, Singer SJ. The Effectiveness of Management-By-Walking-Around: A Randomized Field Study. Prod Oper Manag. 2015;24(2):253–271. doi: 10.1111/poms.12226. - DOI
    1. Friedberg MW, Reid RO, Timbie JW, et al. Federally Qualified Health Center Clinicians And Staff Increasingly Dissatisfied With Workplace Conditions. Health Aff. 2017;36(8):1469–1475. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0205. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nocon RS, Fairchild PC, Gao Y, et al. Provider and Staff Morale, Job Satisfaction, and Burnout over a 4-Year Medical Home Intervention. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(6):952–959. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04893-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed