Specialist use among privately insured children with disabilities
- PMID: 37461185
- PMCID: PMC11250397
- DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14199
Specialist use among privately insured children with disabilities
Abstract
Objective: To investigate primary care practice ownership and specialist-use patterns for commercially insured children with disabilities.
Data sources and study setting: A national commercial claims database and the Health Systems and Provider Database from 2012 to 2016 are the data sources for this study.
Study design: This cross-sectional, descriptive study examines: (1) the most visited type of pediatric primary care physician and practice (independent or system-owned); (2) pediatric and non-pediatric specialist-use patterns; and (3) how practice ownership relates to specialist-use patterns.
Data collection/extraction methods: This study identifies 133,749 person-years of commercially insured children with disabilities aged 0-18 years with at least 24 months of continuous insurance coverage by linking a national commercial claims data set with the Health Systems and Provider Database and applying the validated Children with Disabilities Algorithm.
Principal findings: Three-quarters (75.9%) of children with disabilities received their pediatric primary care in independent practices. Nearly two thirds (59.6%) used at least one specialist with 45.1% using nonpediatric specialists, 28.8% using pediatric ones, and 17.0% using both. Specialist-use patterns varied by both child age and specialist type. Children with disabilities in independent practices were as likely to see a specialist as those in system-owned ones: 57.1% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 56.7%-57.4%) versus 57.3% (95% CI 56.6%-58.0%), respectively (p = 0.635). The percent using two or more types of specialists was 46.1% (95% CI 45.4%-46.7%) in independent practices, comparable to that in systems 47.1% (95% CI 46.2%-48.0%) (p = 0.054). However, the mean number of specialist visits was significantly lower in independent practices than in systems-4.0 (95% CI 3.9%-4.0%) versus 4.4 (95% CI 4.3%-4.6%) respectively-reaching statistical significance with p < 0.0001.
Conclusions: Recognizing how privately insured children with disabilities use pediatric primary care from pediatric and nonpediatric primary care specialists through both independent and system-owned practices is important for improving care quality and value.
Keywords: disability; health care organizations and systems; primary care.
© 2023 Health Research and Educational Trust.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures

References
-
- World Health Organization . The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Children and Youth. WHO Press; 2007. Accessed December 28, 2022. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43737/9789241547321_eng....
-
- United Nations . Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol. United Nations; 2006. Accessed December 28, 2022. http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources