This is a preprint.
Clinical impact of timing of surgery on outcomes in preterm infants with surgical necrotizing enterocolitis
- PMID: 37461487
- PMCID: PMC10350193
- DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3084887/v1
Clinical impact of timing of surgery on outcomes in preterm infants with surgical necrotizing enterocolitis
Update in
-
Association of timing of surgery and outcomes in preterm infants with surgical necrotizing enterocolitis and intestinal perforation.J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2024 Nov;17(6):795-809. doi: 10.1177/19345798241310112. Epub 2024 Dec 26. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2024. PMID: 40016977 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background: The clinical impact of the timing of surgery on outcomes in preterm infants with surgical necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is not well defined.
Aim: We sought to investigate the impact of the different timing of surgery from the day of NEC diagnosis on clinical outcomes in preterm infants with surgical NEC.
Study design: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Subjects: Preterm 75 infants admitted between January 2013 and December 31, 2018, with an NEC (Bell stage III) diagnosis.
Outcomes: Comparison of clinical information by the timing of surgery at three different time points (less and more than 48 hours, 96 hours, and 168 hours) in preterm infants with surgical NEC.
Results: 75 infants were included in the analysis. Those who received surgery after 48 hours (n= 29/75) had lower median gestational age, lower birth weight, had less pneumoperitoneum, were out born less frequently, had higher acute kidney injury, were intubated and ventilated more frequently, and had higher hemorrhagic and reparative lesions on histopathology than those receiving surgery after 48 hours. Infants receiving surgery after 96 hours had similar trends expect had significantly lower hematocrit and more prolonged parenteral nutrition dependence than less than 96 hours group. The infants receiving surgery after one week had significantly lower birth weight and had higher reparative changes and cholestasis than those receiving surgery < 1 week.There was no significant impact of surgery timing on the length of bowel loss, surgical morbidity, Bronchopulmonary dysplasia, white matter injury, and mortality.
Conclusion: The infants receiving surgery later were young and smaller and received parenteral nutrition longer with no significant impact on morbidities and mortality. Our data point out that there are advantages of operating early with fewer morbidities which need further confirmation and evaluation in large multicentric prospective studies or clinical trials.
Keywords: Laparotomy; Neonate; Outcomes; Penrose Drain; Preterm infants; Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis; Timing of disease onset.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: The authors disclose no conflicts.
References
-
- Sankaran K, Puckett B, Lee DS, Seshia M, Boulton J, Qiu Z, et al. Variations in incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in Canadian neonatal intensive care units. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004;39(4):366–72. - PubMed
-
- Blakely ML, Tyson JE, Lally KP, Hintz SR, Eggleston B, Stevenson DK, et al. Initial Laparotomy Versus Peritoneal Drainage in Extremely Low Birthweight Infants With Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis or Isolated Intestinal Perforation: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. Annals of surgery. 2021;274(4):e370–e80. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Rees CM, Eaton S, Kiely EM, Wade AM, McHugh K, Pierro A. Peritoneal drainage or laparotomy for neonatal bowel perforation? A randomized controlled trial. Annals of surgery. 2008;248(1):44–51. - PubMed
-
- Rao SC, Basani L, Simmer K, Samnakay N, Deshpande G. Peritoneal drainage versus laparotomy as initial surgical treatment for perforated necrotizing enterocolitis or spontaneous intestinal perforation in preterm low birth weight infants. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2011(6):Cd006182. - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
