Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1986 Jul;46(1):67-77.
doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-67.

Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers

Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers

J E Mazur. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jul.

Abstract

Pigeons chose between alternatives that differed in the number of reinforcers and in the delay to each reinforcer. A peck on a red key produced the same consequences on every trial within a condition, but between conditions the number of reinforcers varied from one to three and the reinforcer delays varied between 5 s and 30 s. A peck on a green key produced a delay of adjustable duration and then a single reinforcer. The green-key delay was increased or decreased many times per session, depending on a subject's previous choices, which permitted estimation of an indifference point, or a delay at which a subject chose each alternative about equally often. The indifference points decreased systematically with more red-key reinforcers and with shorter red-key delays. The results did not support the suggestion of Moore (1979) that multiple delayed reinforcers have no effect on preference unless they are closely grouped. The results were well described in quantitative detail by a simple model stating that each of a series of reinforcers increases preference, but that a reinforcer's effect is inversely related to its delay. The success of this model, which considers only delay of reinforcement, suggested that the overall rate of reinforcement for each alternative had no effect on choice between those alternatives.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Jul;32(1):51-63 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):115-22 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243-66 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Sep;42(2):255-66 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jan;11(1):9-14 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources