Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers
- PMID: 3746189
- PMCID: PMC1348257
- DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-67
Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers
Abstract
Pigeons chose between alternatives that differed in the number of reinforcers and in the delay to each reinforcer. A peck on a red key produced the same consequences on every trial within a condition, but between conditions the number of reinforcers varied from one to three and the reinforcer delays varied between 5 s and 30 s. A peck on a green key produced a delay of adjustable duration and then a single reinforcer. The green-key delay was increased or decreased many times per session, depending on a subject's previous choices, which permitted estimation of an indifference point, or a delay at which a subject chose each alternative about equally often. The indifference points decreased systematically with more red-key reinforcers and with shorter red-key delays. The results did not support the suggestion of Moore (1979) that multiple delayed reinforcers have no effect on preference unless they are closely grouped. The results were well described in quantitative detail by a simple model stating that each of a series of reinforcers increases preference, but that a reinforcer's effect is inversely related to its delay. The success of this model, which considers only delay of reinforcement, suggested that the overall rate of reinforcement for each alternative had no effect on choice between those alternatives.
Similar articles
-
Probability and delay of reinforcement as factors in discrete-trial choice.J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):341-51. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-341. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985. PMID: 4020322 Free PMC article.
-
Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of variability, time between trials, and conditioned reinforcers.J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Nov;58(3):513-25. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-513. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992. PMID: 1447543 Free PMC article.
-
Influences of delay and rate of reinforcement on discrete-trial choice.J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1985 Oct;11(4):565-75. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1985. PMID: 4067510
-
Delay reduction: current status.J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jul;60(1):159-69. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-159. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993. PMID: 8354964 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Theory and method in the quantitative analysis of "impulsive choice" behaviour: implications for psychopharmacology.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Oct;146(4):362-72. doi: 10.1007/pl00005482. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999. PMID: 10550487 Review.
Cited by
-
Risky choice in pigeons and humans: a cross-species comparison.J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Jan;93(1):27-44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-27. J Exp Anal Behav. 2010. PMID: 20676266 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of reward bundling on male rats' preference for larger-later food rewards.J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Mar;99(2):150-8. doi: 10.1002/jeab.11. Epub 2013 Jan 14. J Exp Anal Behav. 2013. PMID: 23319442 Free PMC article.
-
Variation, repetition, and choice.J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Mar;83(2):147-68. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.33-03. J Exp Anal Behav. 2005. PMID: 15828592 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing preference and resistance to change in constant- and variable-duration schedule components.J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Sep;74(2):165-88. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-165. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000. PMID: 11029021 Free PMC article.
-
Devaluation of stimuli contingent on choice: evidence for conditioned reinforcement.J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jul;48(1):117-31. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-117. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987. PMID: 3625101 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources