Categorizing judgments as likely to be selected by intuition or deliberation
- PMID: 37462194
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X22002886
Categorizing judgments as likely to be selected by intuition or deliberation
Abstract
De Neys argues against the exclusivity assumption: That many judgments are exclusively selected by intuition or deliberation. But this is an excessively strong formulation of the exclusivity assumption. We should aim to develop weaker, more plausible formulations that identify which judgments are likely to be selected by intuition or deliberation. This is necessary for empirical comparisons of intuition and deliberation.
Comment in
-
Further advancing fast-and-slow theorizing.Behav Brain Sci. 2023 Jul 18;46:e146. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X23000559. Behav Brain Sci. 2023. PMID: 37462189
Comment on
-
Advancing theorizing about fast-and-slow thinking.Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 2;46:e111. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X2200142X. Behav Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 36052534 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources