Global prevalence of asymptomatic dengue infections - a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 37463631
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.07.010
Global prevalence of asymptomatic dengue infections - a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objectives: The burden of asymptomatic dengue infections is understudied. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the literature to estimate the global prevalence of asymptomatic dengue infections.
Methods: We searched cross-sectional studies reporting the prevalence of asymptomatic dengue infections from PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Prevalence of asymptomatic dengue infections was pooled and reported as proportions with a 95% confidence interval (CI). This systematic review protocol was a priori registered in The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (Reg: No. CRD42020218446).
Results: We included 41 studies with 131,953 cases in our analysis. The overall pooled prevalence of asymptomatic dengue infections was 59.26% (95% CI: 43.76-74.75, I2 = 99.93%), with 65.52% (95% CI: 38.73-92.32, I2 = 99.95%) during outbreaks and 30.78% (95% CI: 21.39-40.16, I2 = 98.78%) during non-outbreak periods. The pooled prevalence among the acutely infected individuals was 54.52% (95% CI: 17.73-46.76, I2 = 99.91%), whereas, among primary and secondary asymptomatic dengue infections, it was 65.36% (95% CI: 45.76-84.96, I2 = 98.82) and 48.99% (95% CI: 27.85-70.13, I2 = 99.08%) respectively.
Conclusion: The majority of dengue cases are asymptomatic and may play a significant role in disease transmission. Public health strategies aimed at dengue outbreak response and mitigation of disease burden should include early detection of asymptomatic cases.
Keywords: Asymptomatic; Dengue; Global; Meta-analysis; Prevalence; Systematic review.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations of Competing Interest The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical