Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 25;33(5):688-692.
doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-057991.

Trends in cross-border and illicit tobacco purchases among people who smoke in England, 2019-2022

Affiliations

Trends in cross-border and illicit tobacco purchases among people who smoke in England, 2019-2022

Sarah E Jackson et al. Tob Control. .

Abstract

Objectives: The last 5 years have seen substantial changes in England's social and economic landscape as a result of Brexit, the COVID-19 pandemic and cost of living crisis. We aimed to examine changes in cross-border and illicit tobacco purchasing over this period.

Design: Nationally representative monthly cross-sectional survey.

Setting: England, 2019-2022.

Participants: 11 232 adults (≥18 years) who smoked in the past year.

Main outcome measures: We estimated time trends in the proportion reporting purchasing tobacco from (1) cross-border and (2) illicit sources in the past 6 months.

Results: Between February 2019 and October 2022, there was a non-linear increase in the proportion of participants reporting cross-border tobacco purchases (from 5.2% to 16.1% overall; prevalence ratio (PR)=3.10, 95% CI 2.03-4.73). Prevalence first increased from 5.2% to 15.4% between February 2019 and April 2020, before falling to 7.8% between April 2020 and September 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic, and then increasing again to 16.1% by the end of the period. Changes in cross-border tobacco purchasing were more pronounced among participants from more advantaged (from 6.6% to 23.3%; PR=3.52, 95% CI 2.05-5.91) compared with less advantaged (4.4% to 11.5%; PR=2.61, 95% CI 1.17-5.20) social grades (pinteraction=0.034). There was no overall change in the proportion reporting illicit tobacco purchases (from 9.2% to 8.5%; PR=0.92, 95% CI 0.70-1.21), nor any significant difference in trends by social grade (pinteraction=0.783).

Conclusions: Despite a fall in cross-border tobacco purchasing during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic among adults in England who smoke, the proportion reporting cross-border tobacco purchases is now three times higher than it was at the start of 2019. The proportion reporting illicit tobacco purchases has not changed substantially.

Keywords: Cessation; Illegal tobacco products; Socioeconomic status; Surveillance and monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: JB has received unrestricted research funding from Pfizer and J&J, who manufacture smoking cessation medications.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Percentage of adults in England who smoked in the past year and who reported purchasing cross-border and illicit tobacco, February 2019 to October 2022. Data are presented for all adults who smoked in the past year (A, C) and by social grade (B, D). Lines represent point estimates from logistic regression with survey month modelled non-linearly using restricted cubic splines (with four knots for cross-border tobacco and three knots for illicit tobacco; see online supplemental material for details of model selection). Shaded areas represent SEs. Points represent raw weighted prevalence by quarter (see online supplemental material for figures showing raw weighted prevalence by month).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chaloupka FJ, Straif K, Leon ME. Working group, international agency for research on cancer. effectiveness of tax and price policies in tobacco control. Tob Control. 2011;20:235–8. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.039982. - DOI - PubMed
    1. IARC . IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention: Tobacco Control. Volume 14. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2011. Effectiveness of price and tax policies for control of tobacco.
    1. Hill S, Amos A, Clifford D, et al. Impact of tobacco control interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking: review of the evidence. Tob Control. 2014;23:e89–97. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051110. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, et al. Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1248:107–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06202.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Licht AS, Hyland AJ, O’Connor RJ, et al. How do price minimizing behaviors impact smoking cessation? findings from the International tobacco control (ITC) four country survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8:1671–91. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8051671. - DOI - PMC - PubMed