Response Assessment of Primary Liver Tumors to Novel Therapies: an Imaging Perspective
- PMID: 37464140
- DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05762-1
Response Assessment of Primary Liver Tumors to Novel Therapies: an Imaging Perspective
Abstract
The latest developments in cancer immunotherapy, namely the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors, have led to a fundamental change in advanced cancer treatments. Imaging is crucial to identify tumor response accurately and delineate prognosis in immunotherapy-treated patients. Simultaneously, advances in image acquisition techniques, notably functional and molecular imaging, have facilitated more accurate pretreatment evaluation, assessment of response to therapy, and monitoring for tumor recurrence. Traditional approaches to assessing tumor progression, such as RECIST, rely on changes in tumor size, while new strategies for evaluating tumor response to therapy, such as the mRECIST and the EASL, rely on tumor enhancement. Moreover, the assessment of tumor volume, enhancement, cellularity, and perfusion are some novel techniques that have been investigated. Validation of these novel approaches should rely on comparing their results with those of standard evaluation methods (EASL, mRECIST) while considering the ultimate outcome, which is patient survival. More recently, immunotherapy has been used in the management of primary liver tumors. However, little is known about its efficacy. This article reviews imaging modalities and techniques for assessing tumor response and survival in immunotherapy-treated patients with primary hepatic malignancies.
Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Imaging; Targeted therapies.
© 2023. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of HCC response to locoregional therapy: Validation of MRI-based response criteria versus explant pathology.J Hepatol. 2017 Dec;67(6):1213-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.07.030. Epub 2017 Aug 18. J Hepatol. 2017. PMID: 28823713
-
CT imaging findings in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib: Alternative response criteria (Choi, European Association for the Study of the Liver, and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (mRECIST)) versus RECIST 1.1.Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jan;85(1):103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.10.024. Epub 2015 Nov 5. Eur J Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26724654
-
Evolution from WHO to EASL and mRECIST for hepatocellular carcinoma: considerations for tumor response assessment.Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Mar;9(3):335-48. doi: 10.1586/17474124.2015.959929. Epub 2014 Nov 5. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015. PMID: 25370168 Review.
-
Which Criteria Applied in Multi-Phasic CT Can Predict Early Tumor Response in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated Using Conventional TACE: RECIST, mRECIST, EASL or qEASL?Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 Mar;41(3):433-442. doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1829-4. Epub 2017 Oct 30. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29086058 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing Imaging Response to Therapy.Radiol Clin North Am. 2015 Sep;53(5):1077-88. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2015.05.010. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015. PMID: 26321455 Review.
Cited by
-
Role of immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in resectable and unresectable, embolization-eligible hepatocellular carcinoma.Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025 Jul 24;17:17588359251357719. doi: 10.1177/17588359251357719. eCollection 2025. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40727882 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Nishino M, Jagannathan JP, Krajewski KM, O'Regan K, Hatabu H, Shapiro G, et al. Personalized tumor response assessment in the era of molecular medicine: cancer-specific and therapy-specific response criteria to complement pitfalls of RECIST. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(4):737-45. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical