Implant Based Breast Reconstruction Using a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOP® Bra): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- PMID: 37464216
- DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03500-1
Implant Based Breast Reconstruction Using a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOP® Bra): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) can be performed using a variety of biological and synthetic meshes. However, there has yet to be a consensus on the optimal mesh. This study investigates the safety and patient satisfaction of using TiLOOP® Bra in IBBR and compares its postoperative complication risk with that of porcine acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and SERAGYN® BR.
Methods: The literature review was performed via PRISMA criteria, 23 studies met the inclusion criteria for the TiLOOP® Bra review, and 5 studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. Patient characteristics and per-breast complications were collected. Data were analyzed using Cochrane RevMan and IBM SPSS.
Results: In 3175 breasts of 2685 patients that underwent IBBR using TiLOOP® Bra, rippling was observed as the most common complication, followed by seroma and capsular contracture. No significant difference in the overall complication rate between pre- and sub-pectoral IBBR using TiLOOP® Bra. However, the meta-analysis showed that the TiLOOP® Bra group had significantly lower odds of implant loss, seroma, wound dehiscence, and the need for reoperation or hospitalization than the ADM group. Additionally, the TiLOOP® Bra group had a significantly lower seroma rate compared to the SERAGYN® BR group, while the other outcome indicators were similar between the two groups.
Conclusion: TiLOOP® Bra has become increasingly popular in IBBR in recent years. This review and meta-analysis support the favorable safety profile of TiLOOP® Bra reported in the current literature. The meta-analysis revealed that TiLOOP® Bra has better safety than ADM and a comparable risk of complications compared to SERAGYN® BR. However, as most studies had low levels of evidence, further investigations are necessary.
Level of evidence iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Keywords: Acellular dermal matrix (ADM); Complication; Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR); SERAGYN® BR; Titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP® Bra).
© 2023. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.
Similar articles
-
A Retrospective Head-to-head Comparison Between TiLoop Bra/TiMesh® and Seragyn® in 320 Cases of Reconstructive Breast Surgery.Anticancer Res. 2019 May;39(5):2599-2605. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13383. Anticancer Res. 2019. PMID: 31092458
-
Postoperative Complications in Breast Reconstruction With Porcine Acellular Dermis and Polypropylene Meshes in Subpectoral Implant Placement.In Vivo. 2021 Sep-Oct;35(5):2739-2746. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12558. In Vivo. 2021. PMID: 34410963 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-Report Satisfaction and Health-Related Quality of Life in TiLOOP® Bra-Assisted or Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Alone.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Aug;39(4):523-33. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0520-x. Epub 2015 Jun 18. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015. PMID: 26085227
-
Application of TiLOOP bra in implant-based breast reconstruction is associated with decreased complication risk compared with other meshes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World J Surg. 2024 Mar;48(3):631-641. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12003. Epub 2024 Feb 14. World J Surg. 2024. PMID: 38353413
-
Breast reconstruction with TiLOOP® Bra: Another arrow in plastic surgeons' quiver?J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Oct;97:89-114. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.07.060. Epub 2024 Jul 29. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024. PMID: 39151289
Cited by
-
The triple-plane technique: a surgical technique for subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.Gland Surg. 2025 May 30;14(5):958-967. doi: 10.21037/gs-2025-116. Epub 2025 May 27. Gland Surg. 2025. PMID: 40546844 Free PMC article.
-
Single-Stage Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix after Breast Cancer: Comparative Study and Evaluation of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 9;15(22):5349. doi: 10.3390/cancers15225349. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38001609 Free PMC article.
-
Size Does Matter: Mastectomy Flap Thickness as an Independent Decisional Factor for the Peri-Prosthetic Device Choice in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 7;13(23):7459. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237459. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39685918 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Fascia Lata as Matrix for Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Sep 24;12(9):e6196. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006196. eCollection 2024 Sep. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024. PMID: 39318447 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ermoshchenkova MV, Zikiryahodjaev AD, Reshetov IV, Svyatoslavov DS, Sinelnikov MY (2021) Psychological and aesthetic outcomes in breast cancer patients. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 9(7):e3679. https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000003679 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Bi S, Liu R, Wu B, Shen Y, Jia K, Sun K, Gu J (2020) Breast implants for mammaplasty: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of multiple complications. Aesthetic Plast Surg 44(6):1988–1996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01866-0 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Abbate O, Rosado N, Sobti N, Vieira BL, Liao EC (2020) Meta-analysis of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: guide to patient selection and current outcomes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 182(3):543–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05722-2 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Huang NS, Quan CL, Ma LX, Si J, Chen JJ, Yang BL, Huang XY, Liu GY, Shen ZZ, Shao ZM, Wu J (2016) Current status of breast reconstruction in China: an experience of 951 breast reconstructions from a single institute. Gland Surg 5(3):278–286. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2016.03.01 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous