Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Mar;48(5):925-935.
doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03500-1. Epub 2023 Jul 18.

Implant Based Breast Reconstruction Using a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOP® Bra): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Implant Based Breast Reconstruction Using a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOP® Bra): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Tingjian Zhang et al. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) can be performed using a variety of biological and synthetic meshes. However, there has yet to be a consensus on the optimal mesh. This study investigates the safety and patient satisfaction of using TiLOOP® Bra in IBBR and compares its postoperative complication risk with that of porcine acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and SERAGYN® BR.

Methods: The literature review was performed via PRISMA criteria, 23 studies met the inclusion criteria for the TiLOOP® Bra review, and 5 studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. Patient characteristics and per-breast complications were collected. Data were analyzed using Cochrane RevMan and IBM SPSS.

Results: In 3175 breasts of 2685 patients that underwent IBBR using TiLOOP® Bra, rippling was observed as the most common complication, followed by seroma and capsular contracture. No significant difference in the overall complication rate between pre- and sub-pectoral IBBR using TiLOOP® Bra. However, the meta-analysis showed that the TiLOOP® Bra group had significantly lower odds of implant loss, seroma, wound dehiscence, and the need for reoperation or hospitalization than the ADM group. Additionally, the TiLOOP® Bra group had a significantly lower seroma rate compared to the SERAGYN® BR group, while the other outcome indicators were similar between the two groups.

Conclusion: TiLOOP® Bra has become increasingly popular in IBBR in recent years. This review and meta-analysis support the favorable safety profile of TiLOOP® Bra reported in the current literature. The meta-analysis revealed that TiLOOP® Bra has better safety than ADM and a comparable risk of complications compared to SERAGYN® BR. However, as most studies had low levels of evidence, further investigations are necessary.

Level of evidence iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Keywords: Acellular dermal matrix (ADM); Complication; Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR); SERAGYN® BR; Titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP® Bra).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ermoshchenkova MV, Zikiryahodjaev AD, Reshetov IV, Svyatoslavov DS, Sinelnikov MY (2021) Psychological and aesthetic outcomes in breast cancer patients. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 9(7):e3679. https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000003679 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Bi S, Liu R, Wu B, Shen Y, Jia K, Sun K, Gu J (2020) Breast implants for mammaplasty: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of multiple complications. Aesthetic Plast Surg 44(6):1988–1996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01866-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abbate O, Rosado N, Sobti N, Vieira BL, Liao EC (2020) Meta-analysis of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: guide to patient selection and current outcomes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 182(3):543–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05722-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huang NS, Quan CL, Ma LX, Si J, Chen JJ, Yang BL, Huang XY, Liu GY, Shen ZZ, Shao ZM, Wu J (2016) Current status of breast reconstruction in China: an experience of 951 breast reconstructions from a single institute. Gland Surg 5(3):278–286. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2016.03.01 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources