Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 18;23(1):442.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04158-9.

An overview of innovative living arrangements within long-term care and their characteristics: a scoping review

Mara Brouwers  1   2 , Damien S E Broekharst  3   4 , Bram de Boer  5   6 , Wim G Groen  7   8   9 , Hilde Verbeek  5   6
Affiliations

An overview of innovative living arrangements within long-term care and their characteristics: a scoping review

Mara Brouwers et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: Within long-term care, a culture change (e.g. focus on increasing autonomy in everyday life) is leading to the development of innovative living arrangements for older adults. Insight into characteristics of innovative living arrangements, which are described as an alternative to regular nursing homes, is lacking. This review aims to provide an overview of innovative living arrangements and to describe their defining characteristics.

Methods: A scoping review was performed following the framework of Arksey and O'Malley. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses with extension, for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was also followed. The databases PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched. Articles, published between 2012 and 2023 were included when they presented an innovative living arrangement as an alternative to regular nursing homes. A thematic analysis was performed, describing the physical, social, and organizational environment of the innovative living arrangements.

Results: Fifty-six articles were identified describing seven types of distinct innovative living arrangements: small-scale living, the green house model, shared housing arrangements, green care farms, dementia villages, group homes, intergenerational living, and an 'other' category. The themes included supporting autonomy and creating a small-scale and/or homelike environment, which were emphasized in most innovative living arrangements. Other themes, such as involvement of the community, focus on nature, integration of work tasks, and involvement of family members, were emphasized in a subsection of the described living arrangements. Twenty-eight articles reported on the effects of the innovative living environment on residents, family members, or staff members. Most articles (N = 22) studied resident-related outcomes, focusing mainly on quality of life and aspects of daily life.

Conclusion: More insight into the mechanisms of the social and organizational environments is needed, which may lead to greater transparency and homogeneity regarding the description of living arrangements. This review shows that more knowledge is needed about the potential key elements of innovative living arrangements, especially related to their social and organizational environment. This may provide a better guide for developers within long-term care.

Keywords: 24-hour care; Innovation; Innovative living arrangements; Long-term care; Nursing home care; Older adults; Scoping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart data-selection process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hill NL, Kolanowski AM, Milone-Nuzzo P, Yevchak A. Culture change models and resident health outcomes in long‐term care. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2011;43(1):30–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01379.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roberts E, Pulay A. Examining the nursing home physical environment through policy-driven culture change. J Hous Elderly. 2018;32(2):241–62. doi: 10.1080/02763893.2018.1431586. - DOI
    1. White-Chu EF, Graves WJ, Godfrey SM, Bonner A, Sloane P. Beyond the medical model: the culture change revolution in long-term care. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2009;10(6):370–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.04.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. den Ouden M, Bleijlevens MH, Meijers JM, Zwakhalen SM, Braun SM, Tan FE, et al. Daily (in) activities of nursing home residents in their wards: an observation study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(11):963–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.05.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wiersma EC, Pedlar A. The nature of relationships in alternative dementia care environments. Can J Aging. 2008;27(1):101–8. doi: 10.3138/cja.27.1.101. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types