The MINT Sprint 2.0: A picture naming test for detection of naming impairments in Alzheimer's disease and in preclinical AD
- PMID: 37464962
- PMCID: PMC10916946
- DOI: 10.1002/alz.13381
The MINT Sprint 2.0: A picture naming test for detection of naming impairments in Alzheimer's disease and in preclinical AD
Abstract
Introduction: Evidence on the onset of naming deficits in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is mixed. Some studies showed an early decline, but others did not. The present study introduces evidence from a novel naming test.
Methods: Cognitively normal (n = 138), mild cognitive impairment (MCI; n = 21), and Alzheimer's disease (AD; n = 31) groups completed an expanded Multilingual Naming Test with a time-pressured administration procedure (MINT Sprint 2.0). Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers classified participants as true controls (n = 61) or preclinical AD (n = 26).
Results: Total correct MINT Sprint 2.0 scores exhibited good sensitivity and specificity (>0.85) for discriminating true controls from cognitively impaired (MCI/AD) groups and showed significant differences between true controls and preclinical AD groups. Time measurement did not improve classification, but percent resolved scores exhibited promise as an independent AD marker.
Discussion: Naming deficits can be detected in the earliest stages of AD with tests and procedures designed for this purpose.
Keywords: aging; cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers; multilingual naming test (MINT); picture naming; preclinical Alzheimer's disease; speeded naming.
© 2023 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Burke DM, MacKay DG, Worthley JS, Wade E. On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults? Journal of Memory and Language. 1991;30(5):542–579. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90026-G - DOI
-
- Rastle KG, Burke DM. Priming the Tip of the Tongue: Effects of Prior Processing on Word Retrieval in Young and Older Adults. Journal of Memory and Language. 1996;35(4):586–605. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0031 - DOI
