Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul 14:17:26334941231186733.
doi: 10.1177/26334941231186733. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

Advances in contraception: vaginal contraceptive rings

Affiliations
Review

Advances in contraception: vaginal contraceptive rings

Sara Al-Haddad et al. Ther Adv Reprod Health. .

Abstract

The vaginal contraceptive ring is very effective and user dependent. In this article, we will discuss the different types of vaginal contraceptive rings, namely, the etonogestrel/ethinyl estradiol (ENG/EE) ring (NuvaRing, Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA) and the segesterone acetate (SA)/EE (Annovera, Mayne Pharma, Raleigh, NC, USA) ring. The details of dosing and administration, indications, advantages, disadvantages, and cost-effectiveness are presented. This literature review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar. The search terms included 'vaginal contraceptive ring', 'etonogestrel/ethinyl estradiol ring', and 'segesterone acetate/ethinyl estradiol ring'. The search was then sorted by year from 2000 until present, and the most recent articles were reviewed. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive reference on the two vaginal contraceptive rings widely used in the United States for clinicians to guide management. Both vaginal contraceptive rings are combination of hormonal contraceptives that suppress ovulation and create physiologic conditions unfavorable for pregnancy. The ENG/EE ring is designed to be replaced monthly, while the SA/EE ring is a single device used over the course of 1 year. Common side effects of both devices include headaches, nausea, vomiting, and vaginitis. Serious adverse reactions can occur with the vaginal contraceptive rings including venous thromboembolism, psychiatric events, and hypersensitivity. Both devices are contraindicated in patients at high risk for arterial or venous thrombotic events, patients with a history of breast cancer or other estrogen/progesterone cancers, and patients with severe liver disease. Overall, the vaginal contraceptive ring is well tolerated and liked by patients. Patients should be well counseled on known severe adverse reactions. The vaginal contraceptive ring is more expensive than other forms of contraception and this should be an important point of discussion with patients.

Keywords: combined hormonal contraception; contraception; ethinyl estradiol; etonogestrel; segesterone acetate; vaginal contraceptive ring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram for database review.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hoffman BL, Schorge JO, Bradshaw KD, et al.. Williams gynecology. 4th ed.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education LLC, 2020.
    1. NuvaRing [Package Insert]. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck & Co., INC., 2013.
    1. Roumen FJ.Review of the combined contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2008; 4: 441–451. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wieder DR, Pattimakiel L.Examining the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the combined contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing). Int J Womens Health 2010; 2: 401–409. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barnhart KT, Timbers K, Pretorius ES, et al.. In vivo assessment of NuvaRing placement. Contraception 2005; 72: 196–199. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources