Characterization of peripheral blood inflammatory indicators and OCT imaging biological markers in diabetic retinopathy with or without nephropathy

Abstract

Objective: To observe the distribution characteristics of peripheral blood inflammatory indexes and retinal macular area optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging biomarkers in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) with or without diabetic nephropathy (DN), in order to seek clinical biomarkers that can predict the development of DR and DN.

Methods: A total of 169 inpatients with DR who visited the ophthalmology department of the Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from October 2020 to June 2022 and had complete clinical data were collected, and the patients with DR were divided into two major groups, DR and DR/DN, according to whether they had DN, and then further divided into four subgroups, Non-proliferative DR(NPDR), proliferative DR(PDR), NPDR/DN and PDR/DN, according to the stage of DR. The distribution characteristics of peripheral blood inflammatory indexes [Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio(NLR) and Platelet to neutrophil ratio(PLR)], renal function indexes [Cystatin-C(CYS-C), Creatinine(Crea), Uric acid(UA)and Urinary albumin to creatinine ratio(UACR)] and OCT imaging indexes [Hyperreflective foci(HRF), Disorgnization of retinal inner layers(DRIL), Outer retinal tubulations(ORTs), Central retinal thickness(CRT), Retinal nerve fiber layer(RNFL) and Ganglion cell layer(GCL)] were analyzed between the above subgroups.

Results: There was no difference between DR and DR/DN groups in terms of gender, family history of diabetes, duration of diabetes and Body mass index(BMI) (P>0.05), the mean age of the DR/DN group was significantly lower than that of the DR group (P<0.05), and the proportion of the DR/DN group with a history of hypertension was significantly higher than that of the DR group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in hemoglobin A1C(HbA1c) between DR and DR/DN groups (P>0.05). (P>0.05), Hemoglobin(HGB) was significantly higher in the DR group than in the DR/DN group (P <0.05), NLR, PLR, Crea, UA and CYS-C were significantly higher in the DR/DN group than in the DR group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the comparison of HRF, DRIL, ORTs positive rate and CRT between the DR and DR/DN groups (P>0.05). RNFL and GCL thickness were significantly lower in the DR/DN group than in the DR group (P<0.05); history of hypertension (OR=2.759), NLR (OR=1.316), PLR (OR=1.009), Crea (OR=1.018), UA (OR=1.004), CYS-C (OR=3.742) were the independent (OR=0.951), age (OR=0.951), HGB (OR=0.976), RNFL (OR=0.909) and GCL (OR=0.945) were independent protective factors for DR/DN; RNFL (OR=0.899) and GCL (OR=0.935) were independent protective factors for NPDR/DN, RNFL (OR=0.852) and GCL (OR=0.928) were independent protective factors for PDR/DN. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for CYS-C, PLR, Crea, UA and the combination of the four indicators to predict DR/DN were 0.717, 0.625, 0.647, 0.616 and 0.717, respectively.

Conclusions: (1) Low age combined with hypertension HGB, NLR, PLR, CYS-C, Crea and UA may be serum biological markers for predicting DN in DR; meanwhile, PLR, CYS-C, Crea, UA and the combination of the four indicators can be used for risk assessment and adjunctive diagnosis of DN in DR combined with hypertension. (2) The RNFL and GCL thickness in the temporal aspect of the central macular sulcus may be imaging biological markers for predicting DN in DR; meanwhile, GCL thickness may have important value for risk prediction and diagnosis of DN in combination with DR.

Keywords: diabetic nephropathy; diabetic retinopathy; inflammation; neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR); optical coherence tomography (OCT); platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR).

Figure 1

Histogram comparing laboratory test indicators between DR and DR/DN groups. (*represents p<0.05, indicating statistical significance). (A-G) Comparison of HbA1c, HGB, PLR, NLR, Crea, UA, and CYS-C results between the DR And DR/DN groups.

Figure 2

Histogram comparing laboratory test indicators between subgroups. (*represents p<0.05, indicating statistical significance). (A-G) Comparison of HbA1c, HGB, NLR, PLR, Crea, CYS-C and UA results between NPDR, PDR, NPDR/DN and PDR/DN groups; (H) Comparison of UACR results between NPDR/DN and PDR/DN groups.

Figure 3

Histogram comparing DR with DR/DN and subgroup analysis of fundus imaging indices. (*represents p<0.05, indicating statistical significance). (A, B) Results of comparison of OCT indexes between DR And DN; (C–H) Comparison results of four OCT indexes: NPDR, PDR, NPDR/DN and PDR/DN.