Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 3:30:100642.
doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100642. eCollection 2023 Jul.

Managing the cancer backlog: a national population-based study of patient mobility, waiting times and 'spare capacity' for cancer surgery

Affiliations

Managing the cancer backlog: a national population-based study of patient mobility, waiting times and 'spare capacity' for cancer surgery

Ajay Aggarwal et al. Lancet Reg Health Eur. .

Abstract

Background: Waiting times for cancer treatments continue to increase in many countries. In this study we estimated potential 'spare surgical capacity' in the English NHS and identified regions more likely to have spare capacity based on patterns of patient mobility (the extent to which patients receive surgery at hospitals other than their nearest).

Methods: We identified patients who had an elective breast or colorectal cancer surgical resection between January 2016 and December 2018. We estimated each hospital's 'maximum surgical capacity' as the maximum 6-month moving average of its surgical volume. 'Spare surgical capacity' was estimated as the difference between maximum surgical capacity and observed surgical volume. We assessed the association between spare surgical capacity and whether a hospital performed more or fewer procedures than expected due to patient mobility as well as the association between spare surgical capacity and whether or not waiting times targets for treatment were likely to be met.

Findings: 100,585 and 49,445 patients underwent breast and colorectal cancer surgery respectively. 67 of 166 hospitals (40.4%) providing breast cancer surgery and 82 of 163 hospitals (50.3%) providing colorectal cancer surgery used less than 80% of their maximum surgical capacity. Hospitals with a 'net loss' of patients to hospitals further away had more potential spare capacity than hospitals with a 'net gain' of patients (p < 0.001 for breast and p = 0.01 for colorectal cancer). At the national level, we projected an annual potential spare capacity of 8389 breast cancer and 4262 colorectal cancer surgical procedures, approximately 25% of the volumes actually performed.

Interpretation: Spare surgical capacity potentially exists in the present configuration of hospitals providing cancer surgery and requires regional allocation for efficient utilisation.

Funding: National Institute for Health Research.

Keywords: Cancer surgery; Capacity; Patient mobility; Treatment backlog; Waiting times.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Monthly breast cancer surgery procedure volumes at a selected NHS centre between Jan 2016 and Dec 2018, plotted with the 3-year mean and 6-month moving average. Notes: See methods section for estimation of the 6-month moving average. The dashed line represents the maximum monthly surgical capacity based on the 6-month moving average. Spare surgical capacity was estimated as the difference between the maximum surgical capacity based on the 6-month moving average and the average monthly surgical volume over the 3-year period.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a) Net gains and losses of patients due to patient mobility for each hospital providing breast cancer surgery between January 2016 and December 2018. b) Net gains and losses of patients due to patient mobility for each hospital providing colorectal cancer surgery between January 2016 and December 2018.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a) Estimate of the spare surgical capacity between January 2016 and December 2018 for breast cancer surgical procedures across the 21 Cancer Alliances in England. b) Estimate of the spare surgical capacity between Jan 2016 and Dec 2018 for colorectal cancer surgery procedures across the 21 cancer alliances in England.

Similar articles

References

    1. Nuffield Trust Cancer waiting times. 2022. https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/resource/cancerwaiting-time-targets Available:
    1. Nossiter J., Morris M., Parry M.G., et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis and treatment of men with prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2022;130(2):262–270. - PubMed
    1. Maringe C., Spicer J., Morris M., et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer deaths due to delays in diagnosis in England, UK: a national, population-based, modelling study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(8):1023–1034. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manchanda R., Oxley S., Ghaem-Maghami S., Sundar S. COVID-19 and the impact on gynecologic cancer care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;155 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):94–101. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morris E.J.A., Goldacre R., Spata E., et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the detection and management of colorectal cancer in England: a population-based study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6(3):199–208. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources