Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 3:11:1187815.
doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1187815. eCollection 2023.

Concept and considerations of a medical device: the active noise cancelling incubator

Affiliations

Concept and considerations of a medical device: the active noise cancelling incubator

Artur C Jaschke et al. Front Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: An increasingly 24/7 connected and urbanised world has created a silent pandemic of noise-induced hearing loss. Ensuring survival to children born (extremely) preterm is crucial. The incubator is a closed medical device, modifying the internal climate, and thus providing an environment for the child, as safe, warm, and comfortable as possible. While sound outside the incubator is managed and has decreased over the years, managing the noise inside the incubator is still a challenge.

Method: Using active noise cancelling in an incubator will eliminate unwanted sounds (i.e., from the respirator and heating) inside the incubator, and by adding sophisticated algorithms, normal human speech, neonatal intensive care unit music-based therapeutic interventions, and natural sounds will be sustained for the child in the pod. Applying different methods such as active noise cancelling, motion capture, sonological engineering. and sophisticated machine learning algorithms will be implemented in the development of the incubator.

Projected results: A controlled and active sound environment in and around the incubator can in turn promote the wellbeing, neural development, and speech development of the child and minimise distress caused by unwanted noises. While developing the hardware and software pose individual challenges, it is about the system design and aspects contributing to it. On the one hand, it is crucial to measure the auditory range and frequencies in the incubator, as well as the predictable sounds that will have to be played back into the environment. On the other, there are many technical issues that have to be addressed when it comes to algorithms, datasets, delay, microphone technology, transducers, convergence, tracking, impulse control and noise rejection, noise mitigation stability, detection, polarity, and performance.

Conclusion: Solving a complex problem like this, however, requires a de-disciplinary approach, where each discipline will realise its own shortcomings and boundaries, and in turn will allow for innovations and new avenues. Technical developments used for building the active noise cancellation-incubator have the potential to contribute to improved care solutions for patients, both infants and adults.Code available at: 10.3389/fped.2023.1187815.

Keywords: NICU (neonatal intensive care unit); active noise cancellation (ANC); artificial intelligence; ducted system; machine learning; music-based therapy; neural development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ANC-incubator sketch indicating positions of speakers and microphones to create an active noise cancelling pod. The positions of the microphones and speakers are indicative and serve for illustration only.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Perin J, Mulick A, Yeung D, Villavicencio F, Lopez G, Strong KL, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000–19: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the sustainable development goals. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. (2022) 6(2):106–15. 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00311-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard M, Chou D, Moller AB, Narwal R, et al. National, regional and worldwide estimates of preterm birth. Lancet. (2012) 379(9832):2162–72. Estimates from 2010. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Graven SN, Brown JV. Auditory development in the fetus and infant. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. (2008) 8(4):187–193. 10.1053/j.nainr.2008.10.010 - DOI
    1. Ronca AE, Alberts JR, Lecanuet JP. Maternal contribution to fetal experience and the transition from prenatal to postnatal life. In: Ronca AE, Alberts JR, editors. Fetal development: A psychobiological perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; (1995). p. 331–50.
    1. Morris BH, Philbin MK, Bose C. Physiological effects of sound on the newborn. J Perinatol. (2000) 20(8 Pt 2):S55–60. 10.1038/sj.jp.7200451 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources