Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2023 Jun 14:23:e34.
eCollection 2023.

Use of an Autologous Heterogenous Skin Construct in the Treatment of Intractable Late-Effect Radiation Wounds: Case Series

Affiliations
Case Reports

Use of an Autologous Heterogenous Skin Construct in the Treatment of Intractable Late-Effect Radiation Wounds: Case Series

Diana Burgueno-Vega et al. Eplasty. .

Abstract

Background: Late-effect radiation-induced wounds represent a particularly difficult category of wounds to manage and treat. Fibrosis, impaired cellular activity, ischemia, and wound chronicity all work to impair healing, and this becomes more pronounced when defects are large or when avascular structures such as bone are exposed. Effective treatment options for this type of wound are limited. Thorough excision of irradiated tissue followed by distal pedicled or free flap closure is the most successful; however, this often requires multiple-stage surgeries and prolonged hospitalization and is associated with significant donor site morbidity. This is complicated further when wounds are large or in difficult locations, when surgery is not appropriate, or when there is limited access to surgeons with the appropriate experience/skill to perform such procedures.

Methods: This case series describes the use of an autologous heterogenous skin construct (AHSC) made from a small full-thickness sample of the patient's healthy skin. Three patients with intractable late-effect radiation wounds were treated with AHSC. Case 1 describes an abdominal wound with tunneling of 7.5 cm to the pubic symphysis, which had been treated for known osteomyelitis, and a shallower full-thickness groin wound. Case 2 describes a right scapular wound with exposed bone, which had failed flap closure. Case 3 describes a right thigh wound in a patient who had been treated for sarcoma with extensive radiation therapy. This eventually resulted in an above-the-knee amputation, which failed to heal, and full exposure of the distal end of the resected femur. All wounds had been present for greater than 10 months.

Results: Mean percent volume reduction was 83% (±2.7) at 3 weeks and 92.9% (±4.7) at 4 weeks. The tunneled abdominal wound decreased in depth from 7.5 cm to 1.2 cm in 3 weeks. Complete closure was achieved at 11 weeks for the abdominal and groin wounds (patient 1) and at 16 weeks for the thigh wound (patient 3). The scapular wound volume of patient 2 had decreased by 91.8% at week 4 but was not fully restored until week 21. Mean time to closure was 16.1 (±4.7) weeks.

Conclusions: AHSC was effective in covering exposed bone, improving wound bed vascularity, filling in significant wound depth, and achieving complete wound closure with one application in patients with intractable late-effect radiation wounds.

Keywords: AHSC; Autologous; Chronic Wound; Radiation Injury; Regenerative Medicine; Soft Tissue Radio Necrosis; Soft Tissue Reconstruction; Wound Healing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Endoscopic instruments were used for visualization and to ensure adequate debridement.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A fenestrated silicone sheet was applied to protect the graft and negative pressure wound therapy was applied.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean percent volume reduction.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Wound progression.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Wound progression.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Wound progression.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Wound progression.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Patient 1, 2 years post AHSC application: areas that had been treated with AHSC were completely free of inflammation, while the surrounding untreated tissue was significantly inflamed.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Patient 3, formerly wheelchair dependent, walked into a follow up visit wearing his new above-the-knee prosthesis.

Similar articles

References

    1. Majeed H, Gupta V. Adverse Effects Of Radiation Therapy. StatPearls. Published online 2022. Accessed March 28, 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33085406/ - PubMed
    1. Bryant AK, Banegas MP, Martinez ME, Mell LK, Murphy JD. Trends in Radiation Therapy among Cancer Survivors in the United States, 2000-2030. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 2017;26(6):963-970. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-1023 - DOI - PubMed
    1. DiCarlo AL, Bandremer AC, Hollingsworth BA, et al. . Cutaneous Radiation Injuries: Models, Assessment and Treatments. Radiat Res. 2020;194(3):315. doi:10.1667/RADE-20-00120.110.1667/RADE-20-00120.1 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Devalia HL, Mansfield L. Radiotherapy and wound healing. Int Wound J. 2008;5(1):40-44. doi:10.1111/J.1742-481X.2007.00351.X10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00351.x - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dormand EL, Banwell PE, Goodacre TEE. Radiotherapy and wound healing. Int Wound J. 2005;2(2):112-127. doi:10.1111/J.1742-4801.2005.00079.X10.1111/j.1742-4801.2005.00079.x - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources