Anticoagulant therapy during cardiovascular implantable electronic device procedures
- PMID: 37465619
- PMCID: PMC10351075
- DOI: 10.5114/aic.2023.129207
Anticoagulant therapy during cardiovascular implantable electronic device procedures
Abstract
Aim: The objective of the study is to systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of peri-procedural utilization of anticoagulation therapy during cardiovascular implantable electronic device procedures.
Material and methods: The review materials were based on comprehensive retrieval of randomized controlled trials and observational studies published until April 2023. Studies which compared different management strategies of long-term anticoagulation therapy during peri-procedural cardiac rhythm device implantation and compared the complications of bleeding and/or thromboembolic events were selected and reviewed.
Results: Studies analysing non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants interruption versus continuation during peri-procedural implantable cardiac device surgery found no statistically significant difference in bleeding or thromboembolic complications between these strategies. Studies comparing non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants with vitamin K antagonists also showed no statistically significant difference. One study comparing uninterrupted warfarin with interrupted warfarin with heparin bridging reported a reduced incidence of clinically significant device pocket haematoma in patients with continued warfarin treatment (relative risk = 0.19; 95% confidence interval: 0.10 to 0.36; p < 0.001). A sub-analysis of one study comparing dabigatran versus warfarin with heparin bridging and without bridging reported a lower risk of pocket haematoma with dabigatran when compared to warfarin with heparin bridging (risk difference: -8.62%, 95% confidence interval: -24.15 to -0.51%; p = 0.034). Both bleeding and thromboembolic complications were rare.
Conclusions: The traditional method of vitamin K antagonists interruption with heparin bridging is less safe than continuing vitamin K antagonists at therapeutic levels. Both continuation and interruption strategies of non-vitamin K anticoagulants during cardiac device surgery seem to be safe and appropriate.
Keywords: anticoagulation; cardiac resynchronization therapy; device pocket haematoma; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; pacemaker.
Copyright: © 2023 Termedia Sp. z o. o.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Cardiovascular implantable electronic device implantation with uninterrupted dabigatran: comparison to uninterrupted warfarin.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Oct;24(10):1125-9. doi: 10.1111/jce.12214. Epub 2013 Jul 25. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013. PMID: 23889767
-
Pacemaker or defibrillator surgery without interruption of anticoagulation.N Engl J Med. 2013 May 30;368(22):2084-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1302946. Epub 2013 May 9. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 23659733 Clinical Trial.
-
Continuation of warfarin during pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: a randomized clinical trial.Heart Rhythm. 2011 Apr;8(4):536-40. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.12.016. Epub 2010 Dec 13. Heart Rhythm. 2011. PMID: 21147261 Clinical Trial.
-
Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants at the time of cardiac rhythm device surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Thromb Res. 2020 Apr;188:90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.02.007. Epub 2020 Feb 12. Thromb Res. 2020. PMID: 32113073
-
Risk of pocket hematoma in patients on chronic anticoagulation with warfarin undergoing electrophysiological device implantation: a comparison of different peri-operative management strategies.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Apr;19(8):1461-79. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015. PMID: 25967723 Review.
Cited by
-
Factors of mortality in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device: 5-year experience.Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024 May 3;70(4):e20230998. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20230998. eCollection 2024. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024. PMID: 38716936 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mond HG, Proclemer A. The 11th world survey of cardiac pacing and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: calendar year 2009--a World Society of Arrhythmia’s project. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2011; 34: 1013-27. - PubMed
-
- Raatikainen MJP, Arnar DO, Merkely B, et al. . A decade of information on the use of cardiac implantable electronic devices and interventional electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology Countries: 2017 Report from the European Heart Rhythm Association. EP Europace 2017; 19 (suppl_2): ii1-90. - PubMed
-
- Nielsen JC, Thomsen PEB, Højberg S, et al. . A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome. European Heart J 2011; 32: 686-96. - PubMed
-
- Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, et al. . Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter–defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 225-37. - PubMed
-
- Bogale N, Witte K, Priori S, et al. . The European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey: comparison of outcomes between de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy implantations and upgrades. Eur J Heart Fail 2011; 13: 974-83. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous