Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun;19(2):99-112.
doi: 10.5114/aic.2023.129207. Epub 2023 Jun 30.

Anticoagulant therapy during cardiovascular implantable electronic device procedures

Affiliations
Review

Anticoagulant therapy during cardiovascular implantable electronic device procedures

Aurelija Daubaraitė et al. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Aim: The objective of the study is to systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of peri-procedural utilization of anticoagulation therapy during cardiovascular implantable electronic device procedures.

Material and methods: The review materials were based on comprehensive retrieval of randomized controlled trials and observational studies published until April 2023. Studies which compared different management strategies of long-term anticoagulation therapy during peri-procedural cardiac rhythm device implantation and compared the complications of bleeding and/or thromboembolic events were selected and reviewed.

Results: Studies analysing non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants interruption versus continuation during peri-procedural implantable cardiac device surgery found no statistically significant difference in bleeding or thromboembolic complications between these strategies. Studies comparing non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants with vitamin K antagonists also showed no statistically significant difference. One study comparing uninterrupted warfarin with interrupted warfarin with heparin bridging reported a reduced incidence of clinically significant device pocket haematoma in patients with continued warfarin treatment (relative risk = 0.19; 95% confidence interval: 0.10 to 0.36; p < 0.001). A sub-analysis of one study comparing dabigatran versus warfarin with heparin bridging and without bridging reported a lower risk of pocket haematoma with dabigatran when compared to warfarin with heparin bridging (risk difference: -8.62%, 95% confidence interval: -24.15 to -0.51%; p = 0.034). Both bleeding and thromboembolic complications were rare.

Conclusions: The traditional method of vitamin K antagonists interruption with heparin bridging is less safe than continuing vitamin K antagonists at therapeutic levels. Both continuation and interruption strategies of non-vitamin K anticoagulants during cardiac device surgery seem to be safe and appropriate.

Keywords: anticoagulation; cardiac resynchronization therapy; device pocket haematoma; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; pacemaker.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of article selection process. Adapted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework [55]

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mond HG, Proclemer A. The 11th world survey of cardiac pacing and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: calendar year 2009--a World Society of Arrhythmia’s project. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2011; 34: 1013-27. - PubMed
    1. Raatikainen MJP, Arnar DO, Merkely B, et al. . A decade of information on the use of cardiac implantable electronic devices and interventional electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology Countries: 2017 Report from the European Heart Rhythm Association. EP Europace 2017; 19 (suppl_2): ii1-90. - PubMed
    1. Nielsen JC, Thomsen PEB, Højberg S, et al. . A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome. European Heart J 2011; 32: 686-96. - PubMed
    1. Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, et al. . Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter–defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 225-37. - PubMed
    1. Bogale N, Witte K, Priori S, et al. . The European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey: comparison of outcomes between de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy implantations and upgrades. Eur J Heart Fail 2011; 13: 974-83. - PubMed