Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;130(10):1269-1279.
doi: 10.1007/s00702-023-02667-w. Epub 2023 Jul 19.

Interrater reliability of motor severity scales for hemifacial spasm

Affiliations

Interrater reliability of motor severity scales for hemifacial spasm

Ha Yeon Lee et al. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2023 Oct.

Abstract

To compare the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of five clinical rating scales for video-based assessment of hemifacial spasm (HFS) motor severity. We evaluated the video recordings of 45 HFS participants recruited through the Dystonia Coalition. In Round 1, six clinicians with expertise in HFS assessed the participants' motor severity with five scales used to measure motor severity of HFS: the Jankovic rating scale (JRS), Hemifacial Spasm Grading Scale (HSGS), Samsung Medical Center (SMC) grading system for severity of HFS spasms (Lee's scale), clinical grading of spasm intensity (Chen's scale), and a modified version of the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (Tunc's scale). In Round 2, clinicians rated the same cohort with simplified scale wording after consensus training. For each round, we evaluated the IRR using the intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC (2,1) single-rater, absolute-agreement, 2-way random model]. The scales exhibited IRR that ranged from "poor" to "moderate"; the mean ICCs were 0.41, 0.43, 0.47, 0.43, and 0.65 for the JRS, HSGS, Lee's, Chen's, and Tunc's scales, respectively, for Round 1. In Round 2, the corresponding IRRs increased to 0.63, 0.60, 0.59, 0.53, and 0.71. In both rounds, Tunc's scale exhibited the highest IRR. For clinical assessments of HFS motor severity based on video observations, we recommend using Tunc's scale because of its comparative reliability and because clinicians interpret the scale easily without modifications or the need for consensus training.

Keywords: Hemifacial spasm; Interrater reliability; Severity rating scale.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Interrater reliability for HFS rating scales. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) values from Round 1 and Round 2. Whiskers indicate 95% confidence interval. Dashed lines delineate conventional thresholds for interpreting reliability associated with ICC values (poor < 0.5, moderate 0.5–0.75, good 0.75–0.9, and excellent > 0.9) (Koo and Li 2016). See Table 1 for scale abbreviations

References

    1. Auger RG, Whisnant JP. Hemifacial spasm in Rochester and Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1960 to 1984. Arch Neurol. 1990;47:1233–1234. doi: 10.1001/ARCHNEUR.1990.00530110095023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barry MJ, VanSwearingen JM, Albright AL. Reliability and responsiveness of the Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1999;41:S0012162299000870. doi: 10.1017/S0012162299000870. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bujang MA, Baharum N. A simplified guide to determination of sample size requirements for estimating the value of intraclass correlation coefficient: a review. Arch Orofac Sci. 2017;12:1–11.
    1. Charles PD, Adler CH, Stacy M, et al (2014) Cervical dystonia and pain: characteristics and treatment patterns from CD PROBE (Cervical Dystonia Patient Registry for Observation of OnabotulinumtoxinA Efficacy). J Neurol 261:1309–1319. 10.1007/s00415-014-7343-6 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen RS, Lu CS, Tsai CH (1996) Botulinum toxin A injection in the treatment of hemifacial spasm. Acta Neurol Scand 94:207–211. 10.1111/J.1600-0404.1996.TB07053.X - PubMed

Publication types