Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 26;101(13):e1280-e1292.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207664. Epub 2023 Jul 19.

Association of Very Early Treatment Initiation With the Risk of Long-term Disability in Patients With a First Demyelinating Event

Affiliations

Association of Very Early Treatment Initiation With the Risk of Long-term Disability in Patients With a First Demyelinating Event

Alvaro Cobo-Calvo et al. Neurology. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Early treatment is associated with better long-term outcomes in patients with a first demyelinating event and early multiple sclerosis (MS). However, magnetic resonance (MR) findings are not usually integrated to construct propensity scores (PSs) when evaluating outcomes. We assessed the association of receiving very early treatment with the risk of long-term disability including an MR score (MRS) in patients with a first demyelinating event.

Methods: We included 580 patients with a first demyelinating event prospectively collected between 1994 and 2021, who received at least 1 disease-modifying drug (DMD). Patients were classified into tertiles according to the cohort's distribution of the time from the first demyelinating event to the first DMD: first tertile (FT) or very early treatment (6 months; n = 194), second tertile (6.1-16 months, n = 192), and third tertile (TT) (16.1 months, n = 194). A 5-point MRS was built according to the sum of the following indicators: ≥9 brain lesions (1 point); ≥1 infratentorial lesion (1 point); ≥1 spinal cord (SC) lesion (1 point); ≥1 contrast-enhancing (CE) brain lesion (1 point); and ≥1 CE SC lesion (1 point). PS based on covariates and the MRS was computed for each of the outcomes. Inverse PS-weighted Cox and linear regression models assessed the risk of different outcomes between tertile groups. Finally, to confirm the role of MR in treatment decision, we studied the time elapsed from the first demyelinating event to treatment initiation according to the MRS in all patients with radiologic available information, renamed as raw-MRS.

Results: Very early treatment decreased the risk of reaching Expanded Disability Status Scale 3.0 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.97), secondary progressive MS (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.85), and sustained disease progression at 12 months after treatment initiation (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.84), when compared with patients from the TT group. Patients from the FT group had a lower disability progression rate (β estimate -0.009, 95% CI -0.016 to -0.002) and a lower severe disability measured by the Patient-Determined Disease Step (β estimate -0.52, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.13) than the TT group. Finally, there was a 62.4% reduction in the median time between the first demyelinating event and the first-ever treatment initiation from patients displaying a raw-MRS 1 to patients with a raw-MRS 5.

Discussion: Using PS models with and without MRS, we showed that treatment initiation at very early stages is associated with a reduction in the risk of long-term disability accrual in patients with a first demyelinating event.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that earlier treatment of patients with MS presenting with a first demyelinating event is associated with improved clinical outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A. Cobo-Calvo has received grant from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain, JR19/00007. C. Tur has is currently being funded by a Junior Leader La Caixa Fellowship (fellowship code is LCF/BQ/PI20/11760008), awarded by “la Caixa” Foundation (ID 100010434). She has also received the 2021 Merck's Award for the Investigation in MS, awarded by Fundación Merck Salud (Spain) and a grant awarded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación de España (PI21/01860). In 2015, she received an ECTRIMS Postdoctoral Research Fellowship and has received funding from the UK MS Society. She has also received honoraria from Roche and Novartis and is a steering committee member of the O'HAND trial and of the Consensus group on Follow-on DMTs. S. Otero-Romero has received speaking and consulting honoraria from Genzyme, Biogen-Idec, Novartis, Excemed, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, BiogenGSK, and MSD and research support from Novartis. P. Carbonell-Mirabent has received support from traveling from Biogen, and his yearly salary is supported by a grant from Biogen to Fundacio privada Cemcat for statistical analysis. M. Ruiz and A. Papolla report no disclosures. J. Villacieros Alvarez has received grant from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain; + FI21/00282. A. Vidal-Jordana reports no disclosures. G. Arrambide has received compensation for consulting services or participation in advisory boards from Sanofi, Merck, Roche, and Horizon Therapeutics; travel support for scientific meetings from Novartis, Roche, and ECTRIMS; and speaking honoraria from Sanofi, Merck, and Roche. Arrambide is a member of the executive committee of the International Women in Multiple Sclerosis (iWiMS) network and of the European Biomarkers in MS (BioMS-eu) Network. J. Castilló, I. Galan, M. Rodríguez Barranco, and L.S. Midaglia report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. C. Nos has received consultation honoraria from Roche. B. Rodriguez Acevedo reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. A. Zabalza de Torres has received travel expenses for scientific meetings from Biogen-Idec and Novartis, speaking honoraria from Eisai, and a study grant from Novartis. N. Mongay has a predoctoral grant Rio Hortega from Instituto Carlos III (CM21/00018). J. Rio has received speaking honoraria and personal compensation for participating on Advisory Boards from Biogen-Idec, Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Teva, Roche, Janssen, and Sanofi-Aventis. M. Comabella reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. C. Auger reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. J. Sastre-Garriga has received compensation for consulting services and speaking honoraria from Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Bial, Biopass, and Teva, is member of the editorial committee of Multiple Sclerosis Journal, and director of Revista de Neurología. A. Rovira serves/served on scientific advisory boards for Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, SyntheticMR, Bayer, Roche, Biogen, Icometrix, and OLEA Medical and has received speaker honoraria from Bayer, Sanofi-Genzyme, Bracco, Merck-Serono, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Novartis, Roche, and Biogen. M. Tintore has received compensation for consulting services and speaking honoraria from Almirall, Bayer Schering Pharma, Biogen-Idec, Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Viela-Bio, and Teva Pharmaceuticals. M. Tintore is coeditor of Multiple Sclerosis Journal—Experimental, Translational and Clinical. X. Montalban has received speaking honoraria and travel expenses for scientific meetings, has been a steering committee member of clinical trials or participated in advisory boards of clinical trials in the past 3 years with Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Genentech, Genzyme, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Celgene, Actelion, Mylan, and BMS. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Weighted and Adjusted Kaplan-Meier Curves to Reach Time-Dependent Outcomes Between First and Third Tertile Groups
(A) Kaplan-Meier estimation of time to reach EDSS 3.0. At 5 years after the first demyelinating event, 16.8% (95% CI 11.8–23.7) within the first tertile and 32.5% (95% CI 25.6–40.6) within the third tertile, reached EDSS 3.0 (Log-rank, p value = 0.002). (B) Kaplan-Meier estimation of time to reach EDSS 6.0. At 5 years after the first demyelinating event, 2.02% (95% CI 0.7–6.2) within the first tertile and 4.3% (95% CI 2.7–8.8) within the third tertile reached EDSS 6.0 (log rank, p value = 0.021). (C) Kaplan-Meier estimation of time to reach SPMS. At 5 years after the first demyelinating event, 3.4% (95% CI 1.4–7.9) within the first tertile and 12.9% (95% CI 8.6–19.2) within the third tertile reached SPMS (log rank, p value = 0.002). (D) Kaplan-Meier estimation of time to reach SDP after the date of the first-ever treatment initiation, according to tertile treated groups. At 5 years after the first demyelinating event, 4.5% (95% CI 2.2–9.3) within the first tertile and 22.3% (95% CI 16.5–29.8) within the third tertile reached SDP after the date of the first-ever treatment initiation (log rank, p value < 0.001). *Kaplan-Meier curves were weighted by the propensity score and adjusted by the proportion of time on high-efficacy therapy and unbalanced variables derived from pseudopopulations (MRS in time to reach EDSS 3.0, time to reach EDSS 6.0, and time to reach SPMS; and gender and MRS in time to reach SDP at 12 months after treatment initiation). EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale; MRS = Magnetic Resonance Score; SDP = sustained disease progression; SPMS = secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Time From the First Demyelinating Event to Treatment Initiation According to Raw-MRS Values in the Subgroup of Patients With Available Radiologic Information
*This figure shows a smoothed version of a histogram. This is a useful alternative to the histogram for continuous data (as time to treatment is) that comes from an underlying smooth distribution. MRS = magnetic resonance score; n (%) = number of patients (percentage) with available radiologic information included within each the raw-MRS; median (IQR) = median (interquartile range) time from the first demyelinating event to treatment initiation.

Comment in

References

    1. Kinkel RP. Association between immediate initiation of intramuscular interferon beta-1a at the time of a clinically isolated syndrome and long-term outcomes. Arch Neurol. 2012;69(2):183. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2011.1426 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Comi G, Martinelli V, Rodegher M, et al. . Effect of glatiramer acetate on conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (PreCISe study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9700):1503-1511. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61259-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Comi G, Martinelli V, Rodegher M, et al. . Effects of early treatment with glatiramer acetate in patients with clinically isolated syndrome. Mult Scler. 2013;19(8):1074-1083. doi:10.1177/1352458512469695 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kappos L, Edan G, Freedman MS, et al. . The 11-year long-term follow-up study from the randomized BENEFIT CIS trial. Neurology. 2016;87(10):978-987. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000003078 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Comi G, de Stefano N, Freedman MS, et al. . Subcutaneous interferon β-1a in the treatment of clinically isolated syndromes: 3-year and 5-year results of the phase III dosing frequency-blind multicentre REFLEXION study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017;88(4):285-294. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2016-314843 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms