Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 18;31(2):525-530.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad137.

Do you want to promote recall, perceptions, or behavior? The best data visualization depends on the communication goal

Affiliations

Do you want to promote recall, perceptions, or behavior? The best data visualization depends on the communication goal

Jessica S Ancker et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Data visualizations can be effective and inclusive means for helping people understand health-related data. Yet numerous high-quality studies comparing data visualizations have yielded relatively little practical design guidance because of a lack of clarity about what communicators want their audience to accomplish. When conducting rigorous evaluations of communication (eg, applying the ISO 9186 method), describing the process simply as evaluating "comprehension" or "interpretation" of visualizations fails to do justice to the true range of outcomes being studied. We present newly developed taxonomies of outcome measures and tasks that are guiding a large-scale systematic review of the health numbers communication literature. Using these taxonomies allows a designer to determine whether a specific data presentation format or feature supports or inhibits the desired audience cognitions, feelings, or behaviors. We argue that taking a granular, outcomes-based approach to designing and evaluating information visualization research is essential to deriving practical, actionable knowledge from it.

Keywords: data visualization; goals; health communication; health literacy; numeracy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests associated with this work.

Comment in

References

    1. Ancker JS, Senathirajah Y, Kukafka R, Starren JB.. Design features of graphs in health risk communication: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13 (6): 608–18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Fagerlin A.. The effect of format on parents’ understanding of the risks and benefits of clinical research: a comparison between text, tables, and graphics. J Health Commun 2010; 15 (5): 487–501. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zikmund-Fisher B, Fagerlin A, Ubel P.. A demonstration of “less can be more” in risk graphics. Med Decis Making 2010; 30 (6): 661–71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arcia A, Suero-Tejeda N, Bales ME, et al.Sometimes more is more: iterative participatory design of infographics for engagement of community members with varying levels of health literacy. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (1): 174–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. International Standards Organization. Graphical Symbols—Test Methods—Part 1: Method for Testing Comprehensibility. 2014. https://www.iso.org/standard/59226.html. Accessed January 15, 2023.

Publication types