Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov;270(11):5436-5448.
doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11872-2. Epub 2023 Jul 19.

Retreating migraine patients in the second year with monoclonal antibodies anti-CGRP pathway: the multicenter prospective cohort RE-DO study

Affiliations

Retreating migraine patients in the second year with monoclonal antibodies anti-CGRP pathway: the multicenter prospective cohort RE-DO study

Fabrizio Vernieri et al. J Neurol. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Background: The outcome of migraine patients retreated with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) or its receptor (anti-CGRPr) is not completely known.

Methods: This multicentric prospective observational cohort study assessed monthly migraine days (MMDs), migraine acute medication intake (MAMI), and HIT-6 at baseline, after 90-112 days (Rev-1), after 84-90 days since Rev-1 (Rev-2) and 30 days after the last injection of anti-CGRP/CGRPr mAbs (Year-end), in the first and the second year after a discontinuation period.

Results: We enrolled 226 patients (79.6% with chronic migraine; 55.3% on erenumab and 44.7% on galcanezumab or fremanezumab). MMDs, MAMI, and HIT-6-did not differ at the respective first and second-year evaluations in the entire cohort, and comparing anti-CGRP with anti-CGRPr Abs. MMDs (18.1 ± 7.8 vs. 3.4 ± 7.8), MAMI (26.7 ± 28.3 vs.17.7 ± 17.2), and HIT-6 scores (63.1 ± 5.9 vs. 67.1 ± 10.3) were lower in the second year than in the pre-treatment baseline (consistently, p < 0.0001). Second-year baseline MMDs were lower in patients on anti-CGRP mAbs (p = 0.001) and with lower pre-treatment baseline MMDs (p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion: Anti-CGRP/CGRPr mAbs are effective in the second as in the first year. The use of anti-CGRP or CGRPr mAbs influenced the second-year baseline MMDs, but their effectiveness did not differ during the two treatment years.

Keywords: CGRP; Discontinuation; Migraine; Monoclonal antibodies; Real life; Retreatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sacco S, Amin FM, Ashina M et al (2022) European Headache Federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene related peptide pathway for migraine prevention—2022 update. J Headache Pain 23:67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01431-x - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Ashina M, Goadsby PJ, Reuter U et al (2019) Long-term safety and tolerability of erenumab: three-plus year results from a 5-year open-label extension study in episodic migraine. Cephalalgia 39:1455–1464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102419854082 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Pozo-Rosich P, Detke HC, Wang S et al (2022) Long-term treatment with galcanezumab in patients with chronic migraine: results from the open-label extension of the REGAIN study. Curr Med Res Opin. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2022.2059975 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ashina M, Goadsby PJ, Reuter U et al (2021) Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in migraine prevention: results from a 5-year, open-label treatment phase of a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Neurol 28:1716–1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/ENE.14715 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Drellia K, Kokoti L, Deligianni CI et al (2021) Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention: a systematic review and likelihood to help or harm analysis. Cephalalgia 41:851–864. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102421989601 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources