Essential hormones as carcinogenic hazards

Abstract

Recently, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) proposed regulations regarding lists of environmental substances that allegedly pose potential occupational carcinogenic risk. Known carcinogens such as bis(chloromethyl) ether, along with natural substances such as estradiol, estriol, estrone, progesterone, tannic acid, maltose, and lactose, were included in the general OSHA list. Clear distinction between true hazards and essential endogenously formed biochemicals was not made. A major reappraisal of the OSHA list is essential. The revised document should indicate the conditions under which various classes of substances constitute human health hazards -- including dosage levels and routes of entry.

PIP: The OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) considers certain substances to be carcinogenic including such hazardous chemicals as benzo(a)pyrene, asbestos, bis(chloromethyl) ether, 2-naphthylamine, and aflatchines B2 and G1 as well as natural substances such as estradiol, estriol, estrone, progesterone, tannic acid, maltose, and lactose. The results of the carcinogenic effects of these natural substances is in question because of administered dosage levels, chemical structure of the substances, the route the hormones entered the biological system, and testing done in animals and in vitro. Citing lactose, found in milk, and nitrite, found in saliva, as carcinogenics shows a lack of discrimination between authentic carcinogenic hazards and evolved natural chemicals endogenously produced which are essential to survival. It is suggested that OSHA reappraise the substances to indicate the conditions under which substances may be considered a human health hazard including dosages and routes of entry.