Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 4:13:1199741.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1199741. eCollection 2023.

Computational pharmacogenotype extraction from clinical next-generation sequencing

Affiliations

Computational pharmacogenotype extraction from clinical next-generation sequencing

Tyler Shugg et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS), including whole genome sequencing (WGS) and whole exome sequencing (WES), is increasingly being used for clinic care. While NGS data have the potential to be repurposed to support clinical pharmacogenomics (PGx), current computational approaches have not been widely validated using clinical data. In this study, we assessed the accuracy of the Aldy computational method to extract PGx genotypes from WGS and WES data for 14 and 13 major pharmacogenes, respectively.

Methods: Germline DNA was isolated from whole blood samples collected for 264 patients seen at our institutional molecular solid tumor board. DNA was used for panel-based genotyping within our institutional Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments- (CLIA-) certified PGx laboratory. DNA was also sent to other CLIA-certified commercial laboratories for clinical WGS or WES. Aldy v3.3 and v4.4 were used to extract PGx genotypes from these NGS data, and results were compared to the panel-based genotyping reference standard that contained 45 star allele-defining variants within CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP4F2, DPYD, G6PD, NUDT15, SLCO1B1, TPMT, and VKORC1.

Results: Mean WGS read depth was >30x for all variant regions except for G6PD (average read depth was 29 reads), and mean WES read depth was >30x for all variant regions. For 94 patients with WGS, Aldy v3.3 diplotype calls were concordant with those from the genotyping reference standard in 99.5% of cases when excluding diplotypes with additional major star alleles not tested by targeted genotyping, ambiguous phasing, and CYP2D6 hybrid alleles. Aldy v3.3 identified 15 additional clinically actionable star alleles not covered by genotyping within CYP2B6, CYP2C19, DPYD, SLCO1B1, and NUDT15. Within the WGS cohort, Aldy v4.4 diplotype calls were concordant with those from genotyping in 99.7% of cases. When excluding patients with CYP2D6 copy number variation, all Aldy v4.4 diplotype calls except for one CYP3A4 diplotype call were concordant with genotyping for 161 patients in the WES cohort.

Conclusion: Aldy v3.3 and v4.4 called diplotypes for major pharmacogenes from clinical WES and WGS data with >99% accuracy. These findings support the use of Aldy to repurpose clinical NGS data to inform clinical PGx.

Keywords: next-generating sequencing; pharmacogenetic algorithm; pharmacogenetics (PGx); pharmacogenomics (PGx); whole exome sequencing (WES); whole genome sequencing (WGS).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors JH and AB are laboratory directors of The Indiana University School of Medicine Pharmacogenomics Laboratory, a fee-for-service laboratory that offers clinical pharmacogenetic testing. Authors SS and IN have a patent US 20200168298A1 for the Aldy genotyping platform. Authors RR, BAS, and SB are current or former employees of the company LifeOmic Inc., a commercial entity that supports management and analysis of genetic data. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Seidelmann SB, Smith E, Subrahmanyan L, Dykas D, Abou Ziki MD, Azari B, et al. Application of whole exome sequencing in the clinical diagnosis and management of inherited cardiovascular diseases in adults. Circ Cardiovasc Genet (2017) 10(1). doi: 10.1161/circgenetics.116.001573 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Groopman EE, Marasa M, Cameron-Christie S, Petrovski S, Aggarwal VS, Milo-Rasouly H, et al. Diagnostic utility of exome sequencing for kidney disease. New Engl J Med (2019) 380(2):142–51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806891 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang Y, Muzny DM, Reid JG, Bainbridge MN, Willis A, Ward PA, et al. Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders. New Engl J Med (2013) 369(16):1502–11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1306555 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang KL, Mashl RJ, Wu Y, Ritter DI, Wang J, Oh C, et al. Pathogenic germline variants in 10,389 adult cancers. Cell (2018) 173(2):355–370.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.039 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tafazoli A, Guchelaar HJ, Miltyk W, Kretowski AJ, Swen JJ. Applying next-generation sequencing platforms for pharmacogenomic testing in clinical practice. Front Pharmacol (2021) 12:693453. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.693453 - DOI - PMC - PubMed