Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 4:11:1186944.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1186944. eCollection 2023.

Eyes on privacy: acceptance of video-based AAL impacted by activities being filmed

Affiliations

Eyes on privacy: acceptance of video-based AAL impacted by activities being filmed

Caterina Maidhof et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: The use of video-based ambient assisted living (AAL) technologies represents an innovative approach to supporting older adults living as independently and autonomously as possible in their homes. These visual devices have the potential to increase security, perceived safety, and relief for families and caregivers by detecting, among others, emergencies or serious health situations. Despite these potentials and advantages, using video-based technologies for monitoring different activities in everyday life evokes concerns about privacy intrusion and data security. For a sustainable design and adoption of such technical innovations, a detailed analysis of future users' acceptance, including perceived benefits and barriers is required and possible effects and privacy needs of different activities being filmed should be taken into account.

Methods: Therefore, the present study investigated the acceptance and benefit-barrier-perception of using video-based AAL technologies for different activities of daily living based on a scenario-based online survey (N = 146).

Results: In the first step, the results identified distinct evaluation patterns for 25 activities of daily living with very high (e.g., changing clothes, showering) and very low privacy needs (e.g., gardening, eating, and drinking). In a second step, three exemplary activity types were compared regarding acceptance, perceived benefits, and barriers. The acceptance and the perceived benefits of using video-based AAL technologies revealed to be higher in household and social activities compared to intimate activities. The strongest barrier perception was found for intimate activities and mainly regarded privacy concerns.

Discussion: The results can be used to derive design and information recommendations for the conception, development, and communication of video-based AAL technologies in order to meet the requirements and needs of future users.

Keywords: activities of daily living (ADLs); assistive technology; cameras; privacy need; privacy perception; technology acceptance; video-based ambient and assisted living (AAL).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Empirical design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evaluations of privacy need for 25 activities of daily living (Mean values adjunct to bars. Error bars show standard error).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Visualization of specific acceptance of video-based AAL monitoring (Mean values adjunct to bars. Error bars show standard error).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Visualization of benefits and barriers overall (Mean values adjunct to bars. Error bars show standard error).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Visualization of benefits on item level (Mean values adjunct to bars. Error bars show standard error).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Visualization of barriers on item level (Mean values adjunct to bars. Error bars show standard error).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blackman S, Matlo C, Bobrovitskiy C, Waldoch A, Fang ML, Jackson P, et al. . Ambient assisted living technologies for aging well: a scoping review. J Intell Syst. (2016) 25:55–69. 10.1515/jisys-2014-0136 - DOI
    1. Calvaresi D, Cesarini D, Sernani P, Marinoni M, Dragoni AF, Sturm A. Exploring the ambient assisted living domain: a systematic review. J Ambient Intell Hum Comput. (2017) 8:239–57. 10.1007/s12652-016-0374-3 - DOI
    1. Peek ST, Wouters EJ, Van Hoof J, Luijkx KG, Boeije HR, Vrijhoef HJ. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. (2014) 83:235–48. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mortenson WB, Sixsmith A, Beringer R. No place like home? Surveillance and what home means in old age. Can J Aging. (2016) 35:103–14. 10.1017/S0714980815000549 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hwang E, Cummings L, Sixsmith A, Sixsmith J. Impacts of home modifications on aging-in-place. J Housing Elderly. (2011) 25:246–57. 10.1080/02763893.2011.595611 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources