Leveraging the third dimension in microfluidic devices using 3D printing: no longer just scratching the surface
- PMID: 37470814
- PMCID: PMC10799186
- DOI: 10.1007/s00216-023-04862-w
Leveraging the third dimension in microfluidic devices using 3D printing: no longer just scratching the surface
Abstract
3D printers utilize cutting-edge technologies to create three-dimensional objects and are attractive tools for engineering compact microfluidic platforms with complex architectures for chemical and biochemical analyses. 3D printing's popularity is associated with the freedom of creating intricate designs using inexpensive instrumentation, and these tools can produce miniaturized platforms in minutes, facilitating fabrication scaleup. This work discusses key challenges in producing three-dimensional microfluidic structures using currently available 3D printers, addressing considerations about printer capabilities and software limitations encountered in the design and processing of new architectures. This article further communicates the benefits of using three-dimensional structures, including the ability to scalably produce miniaturized analytical systems and the possibility of combining them with multiple processes, such as mixing, pumping, pre-concentration, and detection. Besides increasing analytical applicability, such three-dimensional architectures are important in the eventual design of commercial devices since they can decrease user interferences and reduce the volume of reagents or samples required, making assays more reliable and rapid. Moreover, this manuscript provides insights into research directions involving 3D-printed microfluidic devices. Finally, this work offers an outlook for future developments to provide and take advantage of 3D microfluidic functionality in 3D printing. Graphical abstract Creating three-dimensional microfluidic structures using 3D printing will enable key advances and novel applications in (bio)chemical analysis.
Keywords: 3D printing; Device interconnects; Droplet formation; Microfluidics/microfabrication; Miniaturized systems.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest
GPN and ATW own shares in Acrea3D, a company that is commercializing 3D printers. ATW is an editor of ABC but was not involved in review of the manuscript. The other authors have no conflicts to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Amstad E, Gopinadhan M, Holtze C, Osuji CO, Brenner MP, Spaepen F, Weitz DA (2015) Production of amorphous nanoparticles by supersonic spray-drying with a microfluidic nebulator. Science 349 (6251):956–960 - PubMed
-
- Xu S, Zhang Y, Jia L, Mathewson KE, Jang K-I, Kim J, Fu H, Huang X, Chava P, Wang R (2014) Soft microfluidic assemblies of sensors, circuits, and radios for the skin. Science 344 (6179):70–74 - PubMed
-
- Yager P, Edwards T, Fu E, Helton K, Nelson K, Tam MR, Weigl BH (2006) Microfluidic diagnostic technologies for global public health. Nature 442 (7101):412–418 - PubMed
-
- Gökçe O, Castonguay S, Temiz Y, Gervais T, Delamarche E (2019) Self-coalescing flows in microfluidics for pulse-shaped delivery of reagents. Nature 574 (7777):228–232 - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
