Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Jan;170(1):1-12.
doi: 10.1002/ohn.433. Epub 2023 Jul 20.

CT Scan in Children Suspected of Foreign Body Aspiration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Patrick El Khoury  1 , Mikhael Makhoul  1 , Christopher El Hadi  1 , Christelle Haber  2 , Simon Rassi  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

CT Scan in Children Suspected of Foreign Body Aspiration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Patrick El Khoury et al. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography (CT) scans in the diagnosis of foreign body aspiration (FBA) in children, and to determine whether chest CT scans would reduce the need for diagnostic rigid bronchoscopies.

Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched for relevant articles and conference proceedings that were published in English through November 1, 2022.

Review methods: We included prospective and retrospective studies comparing chest CT scans and rigid bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of FBA in pediatric patients (<16 years old). The pooled estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of the chest CT scan in the diagnosis of FBA were calculated using a fixed- or common-effects analysis and a random-effects analysis that accounts for heterogeneity if present. Forest plots were constructed to combine the evidence identified during the systematic review.

Results: Eighteen articles (4178 patients) were included. The average age of the children was 2.26 (±0.75) years, and 65% (±5.64%) of them were boys. Cough was the most prevalent symptom upon presentation. The pooled analysis showed that the sensitivity of chest CT scan in detecting a foreign body in children was 99% (95% confidence interval, CI [97, 100]; I2 = 72%, τ2 = 0.0065, p < .01). The false negative rate was 1.8% (95% CI [0.3, 2.7]; I2 = 72%, p < .01). The specificity of chest CT scan was 92% (95% CI [83, 98]; I2 = 83%, τ2 = 0.0437, p < .01).

Conclusions: Chest CT scan is a sensitive and specific test for the diagnosis of FBA in the pediatric population. Its use can help to reduce unnecessary rigid bronchoscopies, especially in patients with a low clinical suspicion of aspiration. It should not be a replacement for the gold standard bronchoscopy, particularly in cases where there is a clear history and symptoms suggestive of aspiration.

Keywords: CT scan; aspiration; bronchoscopy; foreign body; pediatric.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS): leading causes of death reports, 1981−2020. 2020. Accessed October 16, 2022. https://wisqars.cdc.gov/fatal-leading
    1. Hitter A, Hullo E, Durand C, Righini CA. Diagnostic value of various investigations in children with suspected foreign body aspiration. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2011;128(5):248-252.
    1. Cavel O, Bergeron M, Garel L, Arcand P, Froehlich P. Questioning the legitimacy of rigid bronchoscopy as a tool for establishing the diagnosis of a bronchial foreign body. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76(2):194-201.
    1. Zerella JT, Dimler M, McGill LC, Pippus KJ. Foreign body aspiration in children: value of radiography and complications of bronchoscopy. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33(11):1651-1654.
    1. Tuckett P, Cervin A. Reducing the number of rigid bronchoscopies performed in suspected foreign body aspiration cases via the use of chest computed tomography: is it safe? A literature review. J Laryngol Otol. 2015;129(S1):S1-S7.