Reply: Confounding in Mendelian randomisation studies
- PMID: 37474152
- PMCID: PMC10356965
- DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00995-2023
Reply: Confounding in Mendelian randomisation studies
Abstract
Mendelian randomisation (MR) overcomes classical confounding issues that beset observational studies. “Horizontal” but not “vertical” pleiotropy can bias MR study findings but we found no evidence that it was present in our MR analysis of GORD on IPF.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Comment on
-
The causal relationship between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomisation study.Eur Respir J. 2023 May 25;61(5):2201585. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01585-2022. Print 2023 May. Eur Respir J. 2023. PMID: 37080571 Free PMC article.
-
Confounding is a risk for all observational designs.Eur Respir J. 2023 Jul 20;62(1):2300687. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00687-2023. Print 2023 Jul. Eur Respir J. 2023. PMID: 37474153 No abstract available.
-
Confounding cannot be ignored in any observational design.Eur Respir J. 2023 Jul 20;62(1):2300732. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00732-2023. Print 2023 Jul. Eur Respir J. 2023. PMID: 37474154 No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical