Impact of rater experience and referral question on detecting magnetic resonance imaging features of idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- PMID: 37475659
- DOI: 10.1111/ene.15986
Impact of rater experience and referral question on detecting magnetic resonance imaging features of idiopathic intracranial hypertension
Abstract
Background and purpose: In idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features are promising diagnostic markers, but the impact of rater experience and the specific referral question is unknown.
Methods: From the Vienna Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension database, patients were included with definitive IIH and routine cranial MRI performed during diagnostic work-up. Frequencies of partial empty sella (ES), optic nerve sheath distension (ONSD), optic nerve tortuosity (ONT), posterior globe flattening (PGF) and transverse sinus stenosis (TSS) were compared in three settings: (i) real-world rating, (ii) junior neuroradiologist without special IIH training and (iii) senior neuroradiologist with experience in IIH imaging (gold standard).
Results: Magnetic resonance imaging scans of 84 IIH patients (88% female, mean age 33.5 years) were evaluated. By gold standard, ONSD was the most frequent (64.3%) followed by TSS (60.0%), ONT (46.4%), ES (44.4%) and PGF (23.8%). Compared to the gold standard, IIH features were described significantly less frequently in routine MRI reports (ONSD 28.6%, ONT 13.1%, PGF 4.8%, TSS 42.9%, p < 0.01 respectively) except for ES (42.9%, p = 0.9). A specific referral question regarding IIH increased detection rates in routine reports, but rates remained significantly lower than by gold standard. In contrast, a rating by a neuroradiologist without special training produced significantly higher frequencies of ONSD (81.0%, p < 0.01) and ONT (60.7%, p < 0.01) but not of ES (47.6%), PGF (29.8%) and TSS (68.1%).
Conclusions: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension MRI features are underestimated in routine MRI reports and partly overcalled by less experienced neuroradiologists, driven by features less well known or methodologically difficult. Reevaluation of MRI scans by an experienced rater (and to a lesser degree a specific referral question) improves diagnostic accuracy.
Keywords: empty sella; idiopathic intracranial hypertension; magnetic resonance imaging; optic nerve sheath distension; optic nerve tortuosity; posterior globe flattening; transverse sinus stenosis.
© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.
Similar articles
-
MRI features of idiopathic intracranial hypertension are not prognostic of visual and headache outcome.J Headache Pain. 2023 Jul 28;24(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s10194-023-01641-x. J Headache Pain. 2023. PMID: 37507663 Free PMC article.
-
MRI findings as markers of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.Curr Opin Neurol. 2021 Feb 1;34(1):75-83. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000885. Curr Opin Neurol. 2021. PMID: 33230036 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transorbital sonography and MRI reliability to assess optic nerve sheath diameter in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.J Neuroimaging. 2023 May-Jun;33(3):375-380. doi: 10.1111/jon.13092. Epub 2023 Mar 1. J Neuroimaging. 2023. PMID: 36859645
-
Noticable Findings in Cranial MRI of the Patients with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2022 Jul;36(4):415-422. doi: 10.1177/19458924211069213. Epub 2022 Mar 2. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2022. PMID: 35234081
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of MRI signs for diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jul;116:106-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.04.023. Epub 2019 May 1. Eur J Radiol. 2019. PMID: 31153551
Cited by
-
Diagnostic process, misdiagnosis and bias in suspected idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a retrospective observational cohort study.BMJ Neurol Open. 2025 Mar 12;7(1):e000863. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2024-000863. eCollection 2025. BMJ Neurol Open. 2025. PMID: 40099165 Free PMC article.
-
The additive value of complementing diagnostic idiopathic intracranial hypertension criteria by MRI - an external validation study.J Headache Pain. 2024 May 6;25(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01781-8. J Headache Pain. 2024. PMID: 38711044 Free PMC article.
-
MRI features of idiopathic intracranial hypertension are not prognostic of visual and headache outcome.J Headache Pain. 2023 Jul 28;24(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s10194-023-01641-x. J Headache Pain. 2023. PMID: 37507663 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Radhakrishnan K, Ahlskog JE, Cross SA, et al. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri): descriptive epidemiology in Rochester, Minn, 1976 to 1990. Arch Neurol. 1993;50:78-80.
-
- Kilgore KP, Lee MS, Leavitt JA, et al. Re-evaluating the incidence of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in an era of increasing obesity. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:697-700.
-
- Chiloiro S, Giampietro A, Bianchi A, et al. Diagnosis of endocrine disease: primary empty sella: a comprehensive review. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017;177:R275-R285.
-
- Friedman DI, Liu GT, Digre KB. Revised diagnostic criteria for the pseudotumor cerebri syndrome in adults and children. Neurology. 2013;81:1159-1165.
-
- Barkatullah AF, Leishangthem L, Moss HE. MRI findings as markers of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Curr Opin Neurol. 2020;34:75-83.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources