Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 21;4(7):539-550.
doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.47.BJO-2022-0117.R1.

The safety of one-stage versus two-stage approach to osseointegrated prosthesis for limb amputation

Affiliations

The safety of one-stage versus two-stage approach to osseointegrated prosthesis for limb amputation

Ella Banducci et al. Bone Jt Open. .

Abstract

Aims: Safety concerns surrounding osseointegration are a significant barrier to replacing socket prosthesis as the standard of care following limb amputation. While implanted osseointegrated prostheses traditionally occur in two stages, a one-stage approach has emerged. Currently, there is no existing comparison of the outcomes of these different approaches. To address safety concerns, this study sought to determine whether a one-stage osseointegration procedure is associated with fewer adverse events than the two-staged approach.

Methods: A comprehensive electronic search and quantitative data analysis from eligible studies were performed. Inclusion criteria were adults with a limb amputation managed with a one- or two-stage osseointegration procedure with follow-up reporting of complications.

Results: A total of 19 studies were included: four one-stage, 14 two-stage, and one article with both one- and two-stage groups. Superficial infection was the most common complication (one-stage: 38% vs two-stage: 52%). There was a notable difference in the incidence of osteomyelitis (one-stage: nil vs two-stage: 10%) and implant failure (one-stage: 1% vs two-stage: 9%). Fracture incidence was equivocal (one-stage: 13% vs two-stage: 12%), and comparison of soft-tissue, stoma, and mechanical related complications was not possible.

Conclusion: This review suggests that the one-stage approach is favourable compared to the two-stage, because the incidence of complications was slightly lower in the one-stage cohort, with a pertinent difference in the incidence of osteomyelitis and implant failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M. Al Muderis reports royalties from and shares in Osseointegration International Pty Ltd, unrelated to this study. W. Lu is employed by Osseointegration International Pty Ltd.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The OPL (Osseointegration Prosthetic Limb) implant: image of the prosthetic components and schematic of the implant in a femur, from Osseointegration International.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Diagrammatic representation of the electronic search strategy: keywords were based on the population (1 & 3), intervention (2), and outcome (4). Each box represents one line of the OVID advanced search string.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Summary of systematic review: PRISMA flow diagram depicting article selection.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Incidence of osteomyelitis with 95% confidence intervals: ● One-stage ■ Two-stage.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Incidence of implant failure with 95% confidence intervals: ● One-stage ■ Two-stage.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hebert JS, Rehani M, Stiegelmar R. Osseointegration for lower-limb amputation: A systematic review of clinical outcomes. JBJS Rev. 2017;5(10):e10. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(3):422–429. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brånemark RP, Hagberg K, Kulbacka-Ortiz K, Berlin Ö, Rydevik B. Osseointegrated percutaneous prosthetic system for the treatment of patients with transfemoral amputation: A prospective five-year follow-up of patient-reported outcomes and complications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(16):e743–e751. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00621. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zaid MB, OʼDonnell RJ, Potter BK, Forsberg JA. Orthopaedic osseointegration: State of the art. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(22):e977–e985. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoellwarth JS, Tetsworth K, Rozbruch SR, Handal MB, Coughlan A, Al Muderis M. Osseointegration for amputees: Current implants, techniques, and future directions. JBJS Rev. 2020;8(3):e0043. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00043. - DOI - PMC - PubMed