Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 5:36:11296.
doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11296. eCollection 2023.

Old Age and Frailty in Deceased Organ Transplantation and Allocation-A Plea for Geriatric Assessment and Prehabilitation

Affiliations

Old Age and Frailty in Deceased Organ Transplantation and Allocation-A Plea for Geriatric Assessment and Prehabilitation

Arved Weimann et al. Transpl Int. .

Abstract

Due to demographic ageing and medical progress, the number and proportion of older organ donors and recipients is increasing. At the same time, the medical and ethical significance of ageing and old age for organ transplantation needs clarification. Advanced age is associated with the frailty syndrome that has a negative impact on the success of organ transplantation. However, there is emerging evidence that frailty can be modified by suitable prehabilitation measures. Against this backdrop, we argue that decision making about access to the transplant waiting list and the allocation of donor organs should integrate geriatric expertise in order to assess and manage frailty and impairments in functional capacity. Prehabilitation should be implemented as a new strategy for pre-operative conditioning of older risk patients' functional capacity. From an ethical point of view, advanced chronological age per se should not preclude the indication for organ transplantation and the allocation of donor organs.

Keywords: frailty; old age; organ allocation; organ transplantation; prehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AW received a research grant for a project on prehabilitation from B. Braun on an institutional account. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Multimodal prehabilitation.

References

    1. Eurotransplant, Statistics Report Library. Quick Start (2023). Available from: https://statistics.eurotransplant.org/ (Accessed February 1, 2023).
    1. Schweda M, Wöhlke S. Selecting Donors and Recipients. In: Hansen SL, Schicktanz S, editors. Ethical Challenges of Organ Transplantation: Current Debates and International Perspectives. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag; (2021). p. 227–243.
    1. Fazal MS, Gordon EJ, Humbyrd CJ. Current Bioethical Issues in Geriatric Organ Transplantation. Curr Transplant Rep (2022) 9:55–62. 10.1007/s40472-022-00364-3 - DOI
    1. Cuende N, Cuende JI, Fajardo J, Huet J, Alonso M. Effect of Population Aging on the International Organ Donation Rates and the Effectiveness of the Donation Process. Am J Transplant (2007) 7:1526–1535. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01792.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goldstein DR. The Graying of Organ Transplantation. Am J Transplant (2012) 12:2569–2570. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04246.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed