Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 1;22(2):157-194.
doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00143.

Organ donation following medical assistance in dying, Part I: a scoping review of legal and ethical aspects

Vanessa Silva E Silva  1 , Amina Regina Silva  2 , Andrea Rochon  3 , Ken Lotherington  4 , Laura Hornby  4 , Tineke Wind  5 , Jan Bollen  6 , Lindsay C Wilson  4 , Aimee J Sarti  7 , Sonny Dhanani  8
Affiliations

Organ donation following medical assistance in dying, Part I: a scoping review of legal and ethical aspects

Vanessa Silva E Silva et al. JBI Evid Synth. .

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review was to collate and summarize the current literature on what is known about organ donation following medical assistance in dying (MAiD). Additionally, for this first part of a 2-part scoping review, the focus is on legal and ethical considerations regarding organ donation following MAiD.

Introduction: Organ donation following MAiD is a relatively new procedure that has sparked much debate and discussion. A comprehensive investigation into the legal and ethical aspects related to organ donation following MAiD is needed to inform the development of safe and ethical practices.

Inclusion criteria: In this review, we included documents that investigated legal and/or ethical issues related to individuals who underwent organ donation following MAiD in any setting (eg, hospital or home) worldwide. We considered quantitative and qualitative studies, text and opinion papers, gray literature, and unpublished material provided by stakeholders.

Methods: This scoping review followed JBI methodology. Published studies were retrieved from databases, including MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection, and Academic Search Complete (EBSCOhost). Gray and unpublished literature included reports from organ donation organizations in Canada, The Netherlands, and Belgium. Two independent reviewers screened all reports (both by title and abstract and by full text) against the inclusion criteria, extracted data, and completed a content analysis. Disagreements between the 2 reviewers were resolved through discussions among the reviewers and the lead reviewer.

Results: We included 121 documents for parts I and II of our scoping review, 89 of which are included in part I. The majority of the 89 documents were discussion papers published in English and in Canada from 2019 to 2021. In the content analysis, we identified 4 major categories regarding ethical and legal aspects of organ donation following MAiD: i) legal definitions, legislation, and guidelines; ii) ethics, dilemmas, and consensus; iii) consent and objection; and iv) public perceptions. We identified the main legislation regulating the practices of organ donation following MAiD in countries where both procedures are permitted, the many ethical debates surrounding this topic (eg, eligibility criteria for organ donation and MAiD, disclosure of donors' and recipients' information, directed organ donation, death determination in organ donation following MAiD, ethical safeguards for organ donation following MAiD), as well as the public perceptions of this process.

Conclusions: Organ donation following MAiD has raised many legal and ethical concerns regarding establishing safeguards to protect patients and families. Despite the ongoing debates around the risks and benefits of this combined procedure, when patients who request MAiD want to donate their organs, this option can help fulfill their last wishes and diminish their suffering, which should be the main reasons to offer organ donation following MAiD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

VSS, ARS, and AR received salaries from Canadian Blood Services to conduct this review. LH is a paid research consultant for Canadian Blood Services. KL and LCW are Canadian Blood Services employees. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Search results and source selection and inclusion process
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scoping review findings on organ donation following medical assistance in dying, and the division into 2 parts: i) legal and ethical aspects, and ii) processes and procedures.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Saad TC. Euthanasia in Belgium: legal, historical and political review. Issues Law Med 2017;32(2):183–204. - PubMed
    1. Government of Canada. Medical assistance in dying: overview [internet]. Government of Canada; n.d. [cited 2023 Jan 5]. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/health-services-benefits....
    1. Bollen J, Hagenaars H, Van Dijk G, Van Heum E, Ijzermans J, De Jongh W, et al. Organ donation after euthanasia in The Netherlands. Transplant Int 2015;28:9.
    1. Bollen J, Ten Hoopen R, Ysebaert D, van Mook W, van Heurn E. Legal and ethical aspects of organ donation after euthanasia in Belgium and the Netherlands. J Med Ethics 2016;42(8):486–489. - PubMed
    1. Ball I, Healey A, Keenan S, Priestap F, Basmaji J, Honarmand K, et al. Organ donation after medical assistance in dying—Canada’s first cases. N Engl J Med 2020;382(6):576–577. - PubMed

Publication types