Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 22;31(8):483.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07956-4.

Qualitative evaluation of the implementation and future sustainability of an e-referral system for smoking cessation at a US NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center: lessons learned

Affiliations

Qualitative evaluation of the implementation and future sustainability of an e-referral system for smoking cessation at a US NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center: lessons learned

Min-Jeong Yang et al. Support Care Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Promoting smoking cessation is recognized as an essential part of cancer care. Moffitt Cancer Center, supported by the National Cancer Institute Cancer Moonshot Cancer Center Cessation Initiative, developed and implemented an opt-out-based automatic electronic health record (EHR)-mediated referral (e-referral) system for Tobacco Quitline services along with options for local group cessation support and an in-house tobacco treatment specialist. This study evaluated barriers and facilitators for implementation of the e-referral system.

Method: Steering committee members (N=12) responsible for developing and implementing the new clinical workflow and nurses (N=12) who were expected to use the new e-referral system completed semi-structured interviews. Qualitative thematic content analyses were conducted.

Results: Interviewees perceived the e-referral system as an effective strategy for identifying and referring smokers to cessation services. However, barriers were noted including competing demands and perceptions that smoking cessation was a low priority and that some patients were likely to have low motivation to quit smoking. Suggestions to improve future implementation and sustainability included providing regular trainings and e-referral outcome reports and increasing the visibility of the e-referral system within the EHR.

Conclusion: Initial implementation of the e-referral system was perceived as successful; however, additional implementation strategies are needed to ensure sustainability at both the clinician and system levels. Recommendations for future modifications include providing regular clinician trainings and developing a fully closed-loop system. Implications for cancer survivors Initial implementation of an e-referral system for smoking cessation for cancer patients revealed opportunities to improve the smoking cessation referral process at cancer centers.

Keywords: Cancer patients; Implementation; Nurses; Qualitative research; Smoking cessation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Thomas H. Brandon, Ph.D. is on the advisory board for Hava Health, Inc.

References

    1. Florou AN, et al., Clinical significance of smoking cessation in subjects with cancer: a 30-year review. Respir Care, 2014. 59(12): p. 1924–1936. - PubMed
    1. Surgeon General, The Health Consequences of Smoking - 50 Years of Progress: Executive Summary, US Department of Health and Human Services, Editor. 2020.
    1. U.S. National Cancer Institute, Treating Smoking in Cancer Patients: An Essential Component of Cancer Care, N.C.I.T.C.M. 23, Editor. 2022: Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute.
    1. Warren GW, et al., Attributable failure of first-line cancer treatment and incremental costs associated with smoking by patients with cancer. JAMA Netw Open, 2019. 2(4): p. e191703. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tseng T-S, et al., Who tended to continue smoking after cancer diagnosis: the national health and nutrition examination survey 1999–2008. BMC Public Health, 2012. 12(1): p. 1–9. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources