Accuracy and patient-centered results of static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in edentulous jaws: a retrospective cohort study
- PMID: 37480368
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05161-5
Accuracy and patient-centered results of static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in edentulous jaws: a retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to compare implant positioning accuracy and patient-centered results between static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (s-CAIS and d-CAIS) in edentulous jaws.
Material and methods: The current study retrospectively evaluated a total of 110 implants placed in 22 fully edentulous patients via s-CAIS or d-CAIS (n = 11). The accuracy of implant positioning was assessed by measuring the implant's angular deviation and deviation at the platform and apex from the preoperative design postoperatively. Patient-centered results, including preoperative and intraoperative patient-reported experiences and postoperative patient-reported outcomes, were extracted from the medical records. The nested t test and chi-square test were used to compare accuracy and patient-centered results between s-CAIS and d-CAIS postoperatively.
Results: The implants in the s-CAIS group showed significantly smaller angular deviation (2.32 ± 1.23°) than those in the d-CAIS group (3.87 ± 2.75°). In contrast, the platform and apical deviation were significantly larger in s-CAIS (1.56 ± 1.19 mm and 1.70 ± 1.09 mm, respectively) than d-CAIS (1.02 ± 0.45 mm and 1.00 ± 0.51 mm, respectively). Furthermore, the implants in the s-CAIS group deviated significantly (p < 0.001) more toward the coronal direction than those in the d-CAIS group. Notably, all patients in the s-CAIS group reported an obvious foreign body sensation during surgery, representing a significant difference from the d-CAIS group.
Conclusions: Compared to s-CAIS, d-CAIS is a reliable technique for the placement of multiple implants in fully edentulous patients with less linear deviation and less foreign body sensation.
Trial registration: The retrospective study was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on August 8th, 2022, with registration number No. ChiCTR2200062484.
Clinical relevance: Despite the increasing use of computer- assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous patients, clinical evidence comparing implant positioning accuracy and patient-centered results between static and dynamic CAIS systems is scarce. Our study demonstrated that compared to s-CAIS, d-CAIS is a reliable technique for the placement of multiple implants in fully edentulous patients with less linear deviation.
Keywords: Accuracy; Computer-assisted implant surgery; Fully edentulous.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
The accuracy of implant placement using a combination of static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous arches: A prospective controlled clinical study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024 Aug;35(8):841-853. doi: 10.1111/clr.14185. Epub 2023 Sep 26. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024. PMID: 37750503
-
Comparison of the accuracy of implant position among freehand implant placement, static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: a non-randomized prospective study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Feb;52(2):264-271. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.05.009. Epub 2022 Jun 23. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023. PMID: 35752531
-
Accuracy of the Yakebot dental implant robotic system versus fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery template in edentulous jaw implantation: A preliminary clinical study.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024 Apr;26(2):309-316. doi: 10.1111/cid.13278. Epub 2023 Sep 20. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024. PMID: 37728030
-
Can computer-assisted implant surgery improve clinical outcomes and reduce the frequency and intensity of complications in implant dentistry? A critical review.Periodontol 2000. 2022 Oct;90(1):197-223. doi: 10.1111/prd.12458. Epub 2022 Aug 4. Periodontol 2000. 2022. PMID: 35924457 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of digital technologies on implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: A scoping review.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024 Aug;35(8):1000-1010. doi: 10.1111/clr.14268. Epub 2024 Apr 13. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024. PMID: 38613432
Cited by
-
Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: Patients' Experience and Perspectives.Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Jun;11(3):e70143. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70143. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025. PMID: 40417979 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Terheyden H, Kreppel M (2016) Oral health-related quality of life and implant therapy: A prospective multicenter study of preoperative, intermediate, and posttreatment assessment. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 44:753–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.02.014 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cabanes-Gumbau G, Agustin-Panadero R, Revilla-Leon M, Zubizarreta-Macho A (2021) Prosthetically-Driven Full-Mouth Implant-Supported Prostheses Using Guided Surgical Implant Planning with Composite Resin Markers: A Case Report. J Prosthodont 30:561–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13367 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Buser D, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Grutter L, Schmid B, Belser UC (2008) Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 subjects with a 2- to 4-year follow-up. J Periodontol 79:1773–1781. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.080071 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cooper, L. F. . (2015). Prosthodontic complications related to non-optimal dental implant placement. Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York
-
- Chen ST ,Buser D (2015) Esthetic complications due to implant malpositions: Etiology, prevention, and treatment. Wiley, New York
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous