Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb;46(1):1175-1179.
doi: 10.1007/s11357-023-00872-9. Epub 2023 Jul 22.

Using voice biomarkers for frailty classification

Affiliations

Using voice biomarkers for frailty classification

Yael Rosen-Lang et al. Geroscience. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Clinicians use the patient's voice intuitively to evaluate general health and frailty. Voice is an emerging health indicator but has been scarcely studied in the context of frailty. This study explored voice parameters as possible predictors of frailty in older adults. Fifty-three participants over 70 years old were recruited from rehabilitation wards at a tertiary medical center. Participants' frailty was assessed using Rockwood frailty index and they were classified as most-frail (n = 33, 68%) or less-frail (n = 20, 32%). Participants were recorded counting from 1 to 10 and backwards using a smartphone recording application. The following voice biomarkers were derived: peak and average volume, peak/average volume ratio, pauses' total length, and pause length standard deviation. The most-frail group had a higher peak volume/average volume ratio (p = 0.03) and greater variance in lengths of pauses between speech segments (p = 0.002). These parameters indicate greater speech irregularity in the most-frail, compared to the less-frail. The most-frail group also had a longer total duration of pauses (p = 0.02). No statistically significant difference was found in peak and average volume (p = 0.75 and 0.39). Most-frail participants' speech had different characteristics, compared to participants in the less-frail group. This is a first step to developing an AI-based frailty assessment tool that can assist in identifying our most vulnerable patients.

Keywords: Frailty; Machine learning; Speech; Voice biomarkers; Voice recording.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Voice parameters by frailty category

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005;173:489. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050051. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Gahbauer EA, et al. A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatr. 2008;8:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-8-24. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kojima G, Iliffe S, Walters K. Frailty index as a predictor of mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2018;47:193–200. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx162. - DOI - PubMed
    1. George EL, Hall DE, Youk A, et al. Association between patient frailty and postoperative mortality across multiple noncardiac surgical specialties. JAMA Surg. 2021;156:e205152. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ness KK, Wogksch MD. Frailty and aging in cancer survivors. Transl Res. 2020;221:65–82. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2020.03.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources