Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep;40(9):2081-2089.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02887-9. Epub 2023 Jul 22.

Remote IVF: a clinical and laboratory guide to performing remote oocyte retrievals

Affiliations

Remote IVF: a clinical and laboratory guide to performing remote oocyte retrievals

Dara S Berger et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

The aim of this guide is to describe different scenarios when remote IVF would be needed, considerations around how to plan for the procedure, proper equipment in the procedure room, and proper transportation of oocytes from the procedure room. There are two different scenarios for remote IVF: (1) IVF clinics designed knowing the embryology laboratory is nonadjacent and (2) IVF clinics that routinely provide care to patients in their clinic and want to provide care to those who are ineligible for a retrieval under anesthesia in an outpatient facility. This guide will focus on both scenarios. Much of the advice can be used for IVF clinics that routinely perform oocyte retrievals nonadjacent to their embryology laboratories. Special considerations are needed when patients with complex comorbidities require high-level of care and hospital-level monitoring while under anesthesia and/or post-oocyte retrieval, and are thus unable to be treated in the standard facility. For these reasons we have created a comprehensive guide to nonadjacent, or off-site, oocyte retrievals for reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) physicians, nurses, and embryologists to use when planning care for IVF patients. Going forward, we will refer to both these scenarios as remote IVF.

Keywords: IVF laboratory; Oocyte retrieval; Quality control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alfonsín AE, Amato AR, Arrighi A, Blaquier JA, Cogorno M, Feldman ES, et al. Transport in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: results of a collaborative trial. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:466–470. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00550-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jansen CA, van Beek JJ, Verhoeff A, Alberda AT, Zeilmaker GH. In-vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer with transport of oocytes. Lancet Lond Engl. 1986;1:676. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)91744-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kingsland CR, Aziz N, Taylor CT, Manasse PR, Haddad N, Richmond DH. Transport in vitro fertilization—a novel scheme for community-based treatment. Fertil Steril. 1992;58:153–158. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55153-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anyaegbunam W, Biljan MM, Barker E, Matson PL. The first pregnancy in a transport-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (T-ICSI) scheme. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12:396–398. doi: 10.1007/BF02215734. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Qureshi S, Walker SE, Pike DJ, Murray AN. Transport in vitro fertilisation: three years experience at a district general hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;17:457–460. doi: 10.1080/01443619750112439. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources