Thermal Profiles for Focal Pulsed Electric Field Ablation
- PMID: 37480857
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.05.005
Thermal Profiles for Focal Pulsed Electric Field Ablation
Abstract
Background: Pulsed electrical field (PEF) ablation may cause tissue heating. These changes are reportedly small, but each PEF system and waveform will have a different behavior, and data are lacking.
Objectives: This study sought to compare the temperature profile of focal point, monopolar biphasic PEF ablation versus radiofrequency (RF).
Methods: Ablation lesions were performed on perfused thigh muscle of swine. PEF lesions were performed with 3 compatible ablation catheters at the highest (25 amp) energy, and 1 catheter (Tacticath SE) was also used at the 22- and 19-amp levels. Temperature changes in the tissue were measured using fluoroptic temperature probes inserted at the muscle surface, as well as 3 mm and 7 mm below the surface. Temperatures were recorded continuously at baseline, during delivery, and after ablation. Muscle temperatures were compared with those of RF lesions performed with 1 catheter (Tacticath SE) at 30 W for 30 seconds.
Results: PEF ablation with 3energy settings produced small temperature changes. Maximum average temperature rise for PEF for the maximum (25-amp) energy setting (32 lesions) was 7.6 °C, 2.8 °C, and 0.9 °C at the surface, 3-mm depth, and 7-mm depth, respectively. The temperature rise was dose dependent, with lower energy settings yielding less temperature rise. RF ablations (10 lesions) produced temperature increases of 16.6 °C, 39.8 °C, and 9.5 °C at the surface, 3-mm depth, and 7-mm depth, respectively.
Conclusions: PEF caused detectable temperature changes in muscle tissue, which never exceeded 2.8 °C at the 3-mm depth versus baseline. By contrast, RF produced substantial temperature rises. These data support that focal monopolar biphasic energy delivered by this PEF technology retains a favorable thermal safety profile.
Keywords: CENTAURI; ablation; cardiac; profile; pulsed electrical fields; temperature.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Characteristics of pulsed electric field cardiac ablation porcine treatment zones with a focal catheter.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Jan;34(1):99-107. doi: 10.1111/jce.15734. Epub 2022 Nov 16. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023. PMID: 36335638 Free PMC article.
-
Microwave catheter ablation of myocardium in vitro. Assessment of the characteristics of tissue heating and injury.Circulation. 1994 May;89(5):2390-5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.5.2390. Circulation. 1994. PMID: 8181165
-
Comparison of in vivo tissue temperature profile and lesion geometry for radiofrequency ablation with a saline-irrigated electrode versus temperature control in a canine thigh muscle preparation.Circulation. 1995 Apr 15;91(8):2264-73. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.8.2264. Circulation. 1995. PMID: 7697856
-
Primer on Pulsed Electrical Field Ablation: Understanding the Benefits and Limitations.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021 Sep;14(9):e010086. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010086. Epub 2021 Sep 20. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021. PMID: 34538095 Review.
-
Needle-based ablation of renal parenchyma using microwave, cryoablation, impedance- and temperature-based monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency, and liquid and gel chemoablation: laboratory studies and review of the literature.J Endourol. 2004 Feb;18(1):83-104. doi: 10.1089/089277904322836749. J Endourol. 2004. PMID: 15006061 Review.
Cited by
-
Impedance drop during focal monopolar pulsed field ablation in the atrium.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Mar 18. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01793-z. Online ahead of print. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024. PMID: 38499824 No abstract available.
-
Efficacy and safety of pulsed field ablation for accessory pathways: a pilot study.Europace. 2024 Jul 2;26(7):euae139. doi: 10.1093/europace/euae139. Europace. 2024. PMID: 38801673 Free PMC article.
-
Thermal side effects during pulsed field ablation: an analysis using computer modelling.Europace. 2025 Mar 5;27(3):euaf035. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf035. Europace. 2025. PMID: 39960855 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Sequential, Colocalized Radiofrequency and Pulsed Field Ablation on Cardiac Lesion Size and Histology.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2025 Feb;18(2):e013143. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.124.013143. Epub 2025 Jan 24. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2025. PMID: 39851044 Free PMC article.
-
Active esophageal cooling reduces peri-esophageal and vagal nerve injury in radiofrequency-current pulmonary vein isolation.Heart Rhythm O2. 2025 May 22;6(8):1106-1113. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.05.019. eCollection 2025 Aug. Heart Rhythm O2. 2025. PMID: 40917188 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources