Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Dec;21(13):3405-3414.e4.
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.07.008. Epub 2023 Jul 22.

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Efficacy and Safety of Cannabidiol in Idiopathic and Diabetic Gastroparesis

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Efficacy and Safety of Cannabidiol in Idiopathic and Diabetic Gastroparesis

Ting Zheng et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Background & aims: Cannabis (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol), a nonselective cannabinoid-receptor agonist, relieves nausea and pain. Cannabidiol (CBD), a cannabinoid receptor 2 inverse agonist with central effects, also reduces gut sensation and inflammation. We compared the effects of 4 weeks of treatment with pharmaceutical CBD vs placebo in patients with idiopathic or diabetic (diabetes mellitus) gastroparesis.

Methods: We performed a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of CBD twice daily (Epidiolex escalated to 20 mg/kg/d; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Dublin, Ireland) in patients with nonsurgical gastroparesis with delayed gastric emptying of solids (GES). Symptoms were assessed by the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index Daily Diary. After 4 weeks of treatment, we measured GES, gastric volumes, and Ensure (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) satiation test (1 kcal/mL, 30 mL/min) to assess volume to comfortable fullness and maximum tolerance. Patients underwent specific FAAH and CNR1 genotyping. Statistical analysis compared 2 treatments using analysis of variance including baseline measurements and body mass index as covariates.

Results: Among 44 patients (32 idiopathic, 6 diabetes mellitus type 1, and 6 diabetes mellitus type 2), 5 patients did not tolerate full-dose escalation; 3 withdrew before completing 4 weeks of treatment (2 placebo, 1 CBD); 95% completed 4 weeks of treatment and diaries. Compared with placebo, CBD reduced the total Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index score (P = .008), inability to finish a normal-sized meal (P = .029), number of vomiting episodes/24 hours (P = .006), and overall symptom severity (P = .034). Patients treated with CBD had a higher volume to comfortable fullness and maximum tolerance and slower GES. FAAH rs34420 genotype significantly impacted nutrient drink ingestion. The most common adverse events reported were diarrhea (14 patients), fatigue (8 patients), headache (8 patients), and nausea (7 patients).

Conclusions: CBD provides symptom relief in patients with gastroparesis and improves the tolerance of liquid nutrient intake, despite slowing of GES.

Clinicaltrials: gov NCT #03941288.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03941288.

Keywords: Accommodation; Cannabinoid; FAAH; Receptor; Satiation; Stomach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential competing interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Experimental design:
After screening and baseline measurement of symptoms based on daily diary, patients with gastroparesis were randomized to 4 weeks’ treatment with oral CBD or placebo. Patients underwent gastric emptying of solids at baseline, and tests of GES, volumes, and satiation at end of treatment. At baseline and (GES) throughout the study, suicidal risk was assessed using the Columbia-suicide severity risk scale (C-SSRS). AE=adverse events; BDQ=Bowel Disease Questionnaire; HAD=Hospital Anxiety Depression scale.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Effects of 4 weeks’ treatment with cannabidiol (n=21) or placebo (n=23) on GCSI components measured daily.
Analysis is based on ANCOVA with BMI and baseline symptoms as covariates. Left panel shows summary of the six elements in the GCSI as total GCSI, and the perceived severity of the gastroparesis (both statistically significant between the two treatments); right panel shows individual symptoms with significant improvements.
None
CONSORT FLOW DIAGRAM

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Camilleri M, Kuo B, Nguyen L, Vaughn VM, Petrey J, Greer K, Yadlapati R, Abell TL. ACG Clinical Guideline: Gastroparesis. Am J Gastroenterol 2022;117:1197–1220. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grover M, Farrugia G, Lurken MS, et al. Cellular changes in diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 2011;140:1575–1585.e8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herring BP, Hoggatt AM, Gupta A, et al. Idiopathic gastroparesis is associated with specific transcriptional changes in the gastric muscularis externa. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2018;30:e13230. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar A, Attaluri A, Hashmi S, Schulze KS, Rao SSC. Visceral hypersensitivity and impaired accommodation in refractory diabetic gastroparesis. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2008;20:635–642. - PubMed
    1. Ingrosso MR, Camilleri M, Tack J, Ianiro G, Black CJ, Ford AC. Efficacy and safety of drugs for gastroparesis: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2023;164:642–654. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data