Three-year outcomes of A Randomized Multicentre Trial Comparing Revascularization and Optimal Medical Therapy for Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions (EuroCTO)
- PMID: 37482940
- PMCID: PMC10493774
- DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00312
Three-year outcomes of A Randomized Multicentre Trial Comparing Revascularization and Optimal Medical Therapy for Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions (EuroCTO)
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO) improves clinical symptoms and quality of life. The longer-term safety of PCI compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT) remains uncertain.
Aims: We sought to evaluate the long-term safety of PCI for CTO in a randomised trial as compared to OMT.
Methods: A total of 396 patients with a symptomatic CTO were enrolled into a randomised, multicentre clinical trial comparing PCI and OMT. Half of the patients had a single CTO; the others had multivessel disease. Non-CTO lesions were treated prior to randomisation (2:1 ratio). During follow-up, crossover from OMT to PCI occurred in 7.3% (1 year) and 17.5% (3 years) of patients.
Results: At 3 years, the incidence of cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction was not significantly different between the groups (OMT 3.7% vs PCI 6.2%; p=0.29). By per-protocol analysis, the difference remained non-significant (OMT 5.7% vs PCI 4.7%; p=0.67). Overall, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were more frequent with OMT (OMT 21.2% vs PCI 11.2%), largely because of ischaemia-driven revascularisation. The rates of stroke or hospitalisation for bleeding were not different between the groups.
Conclusions: At 3 years there was no difference in the rate of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction between PCI or OMT among patients with a remaining single coronary CTO. The MACE rate was higher in the OMT group due largely to ischaemia-driven revascularisation. CTO PCI appears to be a safe option for patients with a single remaining significant coronary CTO. CinicalTrials.gov: NCT01760083.
Conflict of interest statement
G. Werner reports speaker honoraria from Asahi Intecc, Abbott Vascular, Daiichi Sankyo, OrbusNeich, Philips/Volcano, Siemens, and Terumo. J. Escaned reports speaker honoraria from Abbott and Boston Scientific; and received honoraria from Philips. A. Erglis reports speaker fees from Biosensors, Biotronik, and Boston Scientific. E.H. Christiansen received research grants from Asahi Intecc and Biosensors.C. Di Mario reports institutional grants from Abbott Vascular, Amgen, Chiesi, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Philips, and Shockwave; and personal speaker honoraria from Shockwave and Philips/Volcano. A. Bufe reports speaker honoraria from Biotronik. B. Lauer reports speaker honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo, Amgen, Nicolai, Asahi Intecc, Abbott, and Abiomed. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Figures




Comment in
-
Letter: Due to the lack of significant mortality benefit along with high procedural complication rates, percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions should be discouraged.EuroIntervention. 2024 Jan 1;20(1):109. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00830. EuroIntervention. 2024. PMID: 38165109 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Fefer P, Knudtson ML, Cheema AN, Galbraith PD, Osherov AB, Yalonetsky S, Gannot S, Samuel M, Weisbrod M, Bierstone D, Sparkes JD, Wright GA, Strauss BH. Current perspectives on coronary chronic total occlusions: the Canadian Multicenter Chronic Total Occlusions Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:991–7. - PubMed
-
- Galassi AR, Werner GS, Boukhris M, Azzalini L, Mashayekhi K, Carlino M, Avran A, Konstantinidis NV, Grancini L, Bryniarski L, Garbo R, Bozinovic N, Gershlick AH, Rathore S, Di Mario, Louvard Y, Reifart N, Sianos G. Percutaneous recanalisation of chronic total occlusions: 2019 consensus document from the EuroCTO Club. EuroIntervention. 2019;15:198–208. - PubMed
-
- Galassi AR, Brilakis ES, Boukhris M, Tomasello SD, Sianos G, Karmpaliotis D, Di Mario, Strauss BH, Rinfret S, Yamane M, Katoh O, Werner GS, Reifart N. Appropriateness of percutaneous revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusions: an overview. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2692–700. - PubMed
-
- Werner GS, Martin-Yuste V, Hildick-Smith D, Boudou N, Sianos G, Gelev V, Rumoroso JR, Erglis A, Christiansen EH, Escaned J, di Mario, Hovasse T, Teruel L, Bufe A, Lauer B, Bogaerts K, Goicolea J, Spratt JC, Gershlick AH, Galassi AR, Louvard Y EUROCTO trial investigators. A randomized multicentre trial to compare revascularization with optimal medical therapy for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:2484–93. - PubMed
-
- Brilakis ES, Banerjee S, Karmpaliotis D, Lombardi WL, Tsai TT, Shunk KA, Kennedy KF, Spertus JA, Holmes DR, Grantham JA. Procedural outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:245–53. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous