Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 7:14:1191040.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1191040. eCollection 2023.

Cutaneous lesions and other non-endocrine manifestations of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 syndrome

Affiliations

Cutaneous lesions and other non-endocrine manifestations of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 syndrome

Laura Pierotti et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 is a rare genetic syndrome mainly caused by mutations of MEN1 gene and characterized by a combination of several endocrine and non-endocrine manifestations. The objective of this study was to describe cutaneous lesions and other non-endocrine manifestations of MEN1 in a cohort of patients with familial (F) and sporadic (S) MEN1, compare the prevalence of these manifestations between the two cohorts, and investigate the correlation with MEN1 mutation status.

Methods: We collected phenotypic and genotypic data of 185 patients with F-MEN1 and S-MEN1 followed from 1997 to 2022. The associations between F-MEN1 and S-MEN1 or MEN1 mutation-positive and mutation-negative patients and non-endocrine manifestations were determined using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests or multivariate exact logistic regression analyses.

Results: The prevalence of angiofibromas was significantly higher in F-MEN1 than in S-MEN1 in both the whole (p < 0.001) and index case (p = 0.003) cohorts. The prevalence of lipomas was also significantly higher in F-MEN1 than in S-MEN1 (p = 0.009) and in MEN1 mutation-positive than in MEN1 mutation-negative (p = 0.01) index cases. In the whole cohort, the prevalence of lipomas was significantly higher in MEN1 mutation-positive compared to MEN1 mutation-negative patients (OR = 2.7, p = 0.02) and in F-MEN1 than in S-MEN1 (p = 0.03), only after adjustment for age. No significant differences were observed for the other non-endocrine manifestations between the two cohorts. Hibernoma and collagenoma were each present in one patient (0.5%) and meningioma and neuroblastoma in 2.7% and 0.5%, respectively. Gastric leiomyoma was present in 1.1% of the patients and uterine leiomyoma in 14% of women. Thyroid cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, basal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and colorectal cancer were present in 4.9%, 2.7%, 1.6%, 1.6%, 2.2%, and 0.5% of the whole series, respectively.

Conclusions: We found a significantly higher prevalence of angiofibromas and lipomas in F-MEN1 compared with S-MEN1 and in MEN1 mutation-positive compared to MEN1 mutation-negative patients. In patients with one major endocrine manifestation of MEN1 , the presence of cutaneous lesions might suggest the diagnosis of MEN1 and a possible indication for genetic screening.

Keywords: GEP; adrenal; angiofibroma; cutaneous lesions; lipoma; pancreas; pituitary; primary hyperparathyroidism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A facial angiofibroma in a 22-year-old woman with familial MEN1 is shown. It appears as a dome-shaped, skin-colored to red papule located on the nose.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Axial CT scan of a MEN1 patient with multiple lipomatosis. (A) Intrapancreatic lipoma is shown (arrow). (B) Intramuscular lipoma and left renal angiomyolipoma are shown (arrows).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of the main non-endocrine manifestations in MEN1 cohorts. Comparison between non-endocrine manifestations in the F-MEN1 vs. S-MEN1 in the whole cohort (A) and index cases (B) and in MEN1 mutation-positive vs. MEN1 mutation-negative in the whole cohort (C) and index cases (D). Statistical significance was determined by Fisher’s or chi-square test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Pie chart showing the distribution of MEN1 mutations through the exonic and intronic portions of MEN1 gene. Mutations detected in more than one patient or one or more sporadic patients are reported in parentheses. F, familial; S, sporadic.

References

    1. Al-Salameh A, Cadiot G, Calender A, Goudet P, Chanson P. Clinical aspects of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2021) 17(4):207–24. doi: 10.1038/s41574-021-00468-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pardi E, Borsari S, Saponaro F, Bogazzi F, Urbani C, Mariotti S, et al. . Mutational and large deletion study of genes implicated in hereditary forms of primary hyperparathyroidism and correlation with clinical features. PloS One (2017) 12(10):e0186485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186485 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. La P, Desmond A, Hou Z, Silva AC, Schnepp RW, Hua X. Tumor suppressor menin: the essential role of nuclear localization signal domains in coordinating gene expression. Oncogene (2006) 25(25):3537–46. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209400 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hendy GN, Kaji H, Canaff L. Cellular functions of menin. In: Balogh K, Patocs A. editors. SuperMEN1. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. New York, NY: Springer; (2009). p. 37–50. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1664-8_4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thakker RV, Newey PJ, Walls GV, Bilezikian J, Dralle H, Ebeling PR, et al. . Clinical practice guidelines for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2012) 97(9):2990–3011. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-1230 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources