Mediating expectations and experiences that influence birth experiences in Canada's first Alongside Midwifery Unit
- PMID: 37485759
- DOI: 10.1111/birt.12744
Mediating expectations and experiences that influence birth experiences in Canada's first Alongside Midwifery Unit
Abstract
Background: Globally, midwifery-led birthing units are associated with excellent maternal and neonatal outcomes, and positive childbirth experiences. However, little is known about what aspects of midwife-led units contribute to favorable experiences and overall satisfaction. Our aim was to explore and describe midwifery service user experiences at Canada's first Alongside Midwifery Unit (AMU).
Methods: We used a qualitative, grounded theory approach using semi-structured interviews with recipients of midwifery care at the AMU.
Findings: Data were collected from twenty-eight participants between September 2018 and March 2020. Our generated theory explains how birth experiences and satisfaction were influenced by how well the AMU aligned with expectations or desired experiences related to the following four themes: (1) maintaining the midwifery model of care, (2) emphasizing control and choice, (3) facilitating interprofessional relationships, and (4) appreciating the unique AMU birthing environment.
Conclusion: Canada's first AMU met or exceeded service-user expectations, resulting in high levels of satisfaction with their birth experience. Maintaining core elements of the midwifery model of care, promoting high levels of autonomy, and facilitating positive interprofessional interactions are crucial elements contributing to childbirth satisfaction in the AMU environment.
Keywords: alongside midwifery unit; childbirth satisfaction; interprofessional collaboration; midwifery model of care; midwifery-led unit.
© 2023 The Authors. Birth published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Brocklehurst P, Hardy P, Hollowell J, et al. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2011;343(7840):1-13. doi:10.1136/bmj.d7400
-
- Welffens K, Derisbourg S, Costa E, et al. The “cocoon,” first alongside midwifery-led unit within a Belgian hospital: comparison of the maternal and neonatal outcomes with the standard obstetric unit over 2 years. Birth. 2019;47:115-122. doi:10.1111/birt.12466
-
- Gaudineau A, Sauleau EA, Nisand I, Langer B. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in a home-like birth Centre: a case-control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287(2):211-216. doi:10.1007/s00404-012-2553-6
-
- Borquez HA, Wiegers TA. A comparison of labour and birth experiences of women delivering in a birthing Centre and at home in The Netherlands. Midwifery. 2006;22(4):339-347. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2005.12.004
-
- Monk AR, Tracy S, Foureur M, Barclay L. Australian primary maternity units: past, present and future. Women Birth. 2013;26(3):213-218. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2013.06.001
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous