Clinical and radiographic outcomes of implant-supported zirconia fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extension: A proof-of-principle study with a follow-up of at least 1 year
- PMID: 37485971
- DOI: 10.1111/clr.14138
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of implant-supported zirconia fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extension: A proof-of-principle study with a follow-up of at least 1 year
Abstract
Objectives: To test the reliability of full zirconia implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extension (FDPCs) after at least 1 year of function.
Materials and methods: Thirty-five patients in need of implant-supported single unit crowns (SUC) and FDPCs in posterior areas were enrolled. After implant placement, patients were rehabilitated with screw-retained full-zirconia FDPCs. Implant survival rate, pocket probing depth (PPD), presence/absence of bleeding on probing (BoP), and presence/absence of mechanical/technical complications were recorded. Mesial and distal radiographic marginal bone levels (mBLs) from baseline (i.e., recall appointment 3-6 months after implant loading [T0]) to the follow-up examination (i.e., latest recall appointment after at least 12 months after T0 [T1]), were calculated.
Results: Thirty patients with 34 FDPCs (31 SUCs and 3 FDPs) supported by 37 implants were available for analysis after a mean loading time of 2.6 ± 1.5 years (range: 13-87 months). No implants were lost. MBLs and mean PPD values did not change statistically significantly from T0 to T1 from 0.92 mm ± 0.42 to 0.96 mm ± 0.38 (95% CI: -0.07/0.17; p = .418) and from 2.99 mm ± 0.70 to 3.27 mm ± 0.71 (95% CI: -0.11/0.68; p = .25) respectively. Peri-implant mucositis was diagnosed in 22 cases. Screw-loosening and zirconia chipping occurred 1× in 4 patients.
Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present proof-of-principle study, the use of full-zirconia FDPCs in posterior areas seems a valid and safe short-term treatment option.
Keywords: biological complications; bone loss; cantilever extension; dental implants; fixed dental prostheses; technical complications.
© 2023 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Aglietta, M., Iorio Siciliano, V., Blasi, A., Sculean, A., Bragger, U., Lang, N. P., & Salvi, G. E. (2012). Clinical and radiographic changes at implants supporting single-unit crowns (SCs) and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with one cantilever extension. A retrospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(5), 550-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02391.x
-
- Araujo, M. G., & Lindhe, J. (2018). Peri-implant health. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 45(Suppl 20), S230-S236. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12952
-
- Buser, D., von Arx, T., ten Bruggenkate, C., & Weingart, D. (2000). Basic surgical principles with ITI implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 11(Suppl 1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011s1059.x
-
- Carra, M. C., Range, H., Swerts, P. J., Tuand, K., Vandamme, K., & Bouchard, P. (2022). Effectiveness of implant-supported fixed partial denture in patients with history of periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 49(Suppl 24), 208-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13481
-
- De Ry, S. P., Roccuzzo, A., Lang, N. P., Heitz-Mayfield, L. J., Ramseier, C. A., Sculean, A., & Salvi, G. E. (2021). Evaluation of the implant disease risk assessment (IDRA) tool: A retrospective study in patients with treated periodontitis and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). Clinical Oral Implants Research, 32(11), 1299-1307. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13828
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources