The solubility, pH value, chemical structure, radiopacity, and cytotoxicity of four different root canal sealers: an in vitro study
- PMID: 37486382
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05160-6
The solubility, pH value, chemical structure, radiopacity, and cytotoxicity of four different root canal sealers: an in vitro study
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate solubility, pH value, chemical structure, radiopacity, and cytotoxicity of AH Plus BC, TotalFill BC, AH Plus, and AH Plus Jet sealers.
Materials and methods: Cytotoxicity analysis with direct and extraction tests at 3 different concentrations (1:1, 1:2, 1:4 v/v%) and time (24 h, 48 h, and 72 h) on Saos-2, PdLF, and THP-1 cell lines, chemical structure with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis, solubility, pH, and radiopacity values of AH Plus BC, TotalFill BC, AH Plus, and AH Plus Jet were evaluated. For statistical analyses of the groups, repeated measures, factorial, and one-way ANOVA tests were used. The statistical significance level was set at p < .05.
Results: Resin-based sealers showed higher cytotoxicity values than the bioceramic-based sealers (p < 0.05). Time and concentrations were effective on the cell viabilities for cell lines. Higher peaks of calcium were detected bioceramic-based sealers and higher amount of zirconium was detected in AH Plus BC (p < 0.05). AH Plus BC showed similar radiopacity value with AH Plus, AH Plus Jet, whereas TotalFill BC showed the lowest radiopacity (p < 0.05). Bioceramic-based sealers had higher pH values in all experiment periods, and the difference between resin- and bioceramic-based sealer groups was significant (p < 0.05). However, the solubility values of the tested root canal sealers revealed no differences (p > 0.05).
Conclusions: The newly produced AH Plus BC Sealer showed similar properties with TotalFill BC, and their biological properties were better than AH Plus and AH Plus Jet.
Clinical relevance: AH Plus BC could be a possible alternative to other bioceramic- or resin-based sealers.
Keywords: Bioceramic-based sealer; Cytotoxicity; Radiopacity; Resin-based sealer; Solubility; pH value.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Chemical-Physical Properties and Bioactivity of New Premixed Calcium Silicate-Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 11;23(22):13914. doi: 10.3390/ijms232213914. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36430393 Free PMC article.
-
Characterization and Assessment of Physical Properties of 3 Single Syringe Hydraulic Cement-based Sealers.J Endod. 2024 Mar;50(3):381-388. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2024.01.001. Epub 2024 Jan 14. J Endod. 2024. PMID: 38219956
-
Physicochemical Properties and Biocompatibility of Various Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers: In Vitro Study.J Endod. 2023 Jul;49(7):871-879. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.05.013. Epub 2023 May 22. J Endod. 2023. PMID: 37225037
-
Solubility of bioceramic- and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Aust Endod J. 2021 Dec;47(3):690-702. doi: 10.1111/aej.12487. Epub 2021 Feb 1. Aust Endod J. 2021. PMID: 33523574
-
Epoxy resin-based root canal sealers: An integrative literature review.Dent Med Probl. 2024 Mar-Apr;61(2):279-291. doi: 10.17219/dmp/156654. Dent Med Probl. 2024. PMID: 38686970 Review.
Cited by
-
Microstructural and Elemental Characterization of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers.Nanomaterials (Basel). 2025 May 18;15(10):756. doi: 10.3390/nano15100756. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40423146 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro Evaluation of Cytotoxicity, Biocompatibility, and Osteogenic Effect of Two Calcium Silicate Sealers Compared with AH Plus Jet.Eur J Dent. 2025 Jul;19(3):617-623. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1789602. Epub 2025 Mar 12. Eur J Dent. 2025. PMID: 40073995 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative bioactivity and immunomodulatory potential of the new Bioroot Flow and AH Plus Bioceramic sealer: An in vitro study on hPDLSCs.Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Mar 5;28(3):195. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05593-7. Clin Oral Investig. 2024. PMID: 38441709 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the apical sealing of an eggshell hydroxyapatite-based sealer.J Clin Exp Dent. 2023 Nov 1;15(11):e895-e903. doi: 10.4317/jced.60743. eCollection 2023 Nov. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023. PMID: 38074171 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mann A, Zeng Y, Kirkpatrick T et al (2022) Evaluation of the physicochemical and biological properties of EndoSequence BC Sealer HiFlow. J Endod 48:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2021.10.001 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Al-Haddad AY, Kutty MG, Abu Kasim NH, Che Ab Aziz ZA (2017) The effect of moisture conditions on the constitution of two bioceramic-based root canal sealers. J Dent Sci 12:340–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2017.03.008 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Rodriguez-Lozano FJ, Garcia-Bernal D, Onate-Sanchez RE, Ortolani-Seltenerich PS, Forner L, Moraleda JM (2017) Evaluation of cytocompatibility of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers and their effects on the biological responses of mesenchymal dental stem cells. Int Endod J 50:67–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12596 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Koch KA, Brave DG (2012) Bioceramics, part I: the clinician’s viewpoint. Dent Today 31:130–135 - PubMed
-
- Prati C, Gandolfi MG (2015) Calcium silicate bioactive cements: biological perspectives and clinical applications. Dent Mater 31:351–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.004 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources