A Pine in Distress: How Infection by Different Pathogenic Fungi Affect Lodgepole Pine Chemical Defenses
- PMID: 37486583
- DOI: 10.1007/s00248-023-02272-0
A Pine in Distress: How Infection by Different Pathogenic Fungi Affect Lodgepole Pine Chemical Defenses
Abstract
In North America, lodgepole pine is frequently subjected to attacks by various biotic agents that compromise its ability to defend against subsequent attacks by insect herbivores. We investigated whether infections of lodgepole pine by different pathogenic fungal species have varying effects on its defense chemistry. We selected two common pathogens, Atropellis canker, Atropellis piniphila, and western gall rust, Endocronartium harknessii, affecting mature lodgepole pine trees in western Canada. We also included three ophiostomatoid fungi Grosmannia clavigera, Ophiostoma montium, and Leptographium longiclavatum associated with the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae), because they are commonly used to investigate induced defenses of host trees of bark beetles. We collected phloem samples from lodgepole pines infected with the rust or the canker and healthy lodgepole pines in the same stand. We also inoculated mature lodgepole pines with the three fungal symbionts and collected phloem samples 2 weeks later when the defense chemistry was at its highest level. Different fungal species differentially altered the terpene chemistry of lodgepole pine trees. E. harknessii and the fungal symbionts altered the terpene chemistry in a similar pattern while trees responded to the infection by the A. piniphila differently. Our study highlights the importance of considering specific biotic stress agents in tree susceptibility or resistance to the subsequent attacks by insect herbivores, such as mountain pine beetle.
Keywords: Atropellis canker; Bark beetles; Fungi; Metabolites; Pinus contorta; Symbiosis; Western gall rust.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Rapid monoterpene induction promotes the susceptibility of a novel host pine to mountain pine beetle colonization but not to beetle-vectored fungi.Tree Physiol. 2017 Dec 1;37(12):1597-1610. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx089. Tree Physiol. 2017. PMID: 28985375
-
Evidence that Ophiostomatoid Fungal Symbionts of Mountain Pine Beetle Do Not Play a Role in Overcoming Lodgepole Pine Defenses During Mass Attack.Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2024 May;37(5):445-458. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-06-23-0077-R. Epub 2024 May 22. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2024. PMID: 38240660
-
Water-deficit and fungal infection can differentially affect the production of different classes of defense compounds in two host pines of mountain pine beetle.Tree Physiol. 2017 Mar 1;37(3):338-350. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpw105. Tree Physiol. 2017. PMID: 27881799
-
Pathophysiological responses of pine defensive metabolites largely lack differences between pine species but vary with eliciting ophiostomatoid fungal species.Tree Physiol. 2019 Jul 18;39(7):1121-1135. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpz012. Tree Physiol. 2019. PMID: 30877758
-
Volatile Organic Compounds Emitted by Fungal Associates of Conifer Bark Beetles and their Potential in Bark Beetle Control.J Chem Ecol. 2016 Sep;42(9):952-969. doi: 10.1007/s10886-016-0768-x. Epub 2016 Sep 29. J Chem Ecol. 2016. PMID: 27687998 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Scots Pines With Tolerance to Melampsora pinitorqua and Diplodia sapinea Show Distinct Metabolic Profiles.Plant Cell Environ. 2025 Feb;48(2):1479-1493. doi: 10.1111/pce.15218. Epub 2024 Oct 25. Plant Cell Environ. 2025. PMID: 39450910 Free PMC article.
-
Navigating the Semiochemical Landscape: Attraction of Subcortical Beetle Communities to Bark Beetle Pheromones, Fungal and Host Tree Volatiles.Insects. 2025 Jan 9;16(1):57. doi: 10.3390/insects16010057. Insects. 2025. PMID: 39859638 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Teshome DT, Zharare GE, Naidoo S (2020) The threat of the combined effect of biotic and abiotic stress factors in forestry under a changing climate. Front Plant Sci 11:1874 - DOI
-
- Franceschi VR, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Krekling T (2005) Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytol 167:353–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01436.x - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources